Skip to main content

Don Lemon and the St. Paul Nine are Headed for Prime Time

 

     As Bleeding Minnesota continues to dominate both the news and our consciousness, there’s one episode that especially embodies the utter madness of the cultural spasm playing out in front of us.

The January 18th protest at the Cities Church in St. Paul has everything you’d want in a Trump-era legal crisis: institutional incompetence, political gaslighting, ostentatious cruelty, and bad faith everywhere you look. All the hits.

Already, Pam Bondi is in way over her head, but that’s not stopping her. In her latest overreach, she arrested Don Lemon, last Friday, for his attendance as a journalist at that protest. If the stakes and the visibility weren’t already high enough, charging Lemon pushes them through the roof.

I’m guessing Lemon planned for this. His brand has been more-or-less in limbo since his racially-tinged purge by CNN two years ago, and he knows that Trump, like dictators everywhere, lusts to see reporters stand trial.

Apparently Lemon thinks poking the bear is a good career move. Being a reporter, Black, and gay makes him a walking trifecta of things Trump hates. This is certainly raising his profile, but risk-free it is not.

Whatever his motives, Lemon lawyered-up in advance. He hired Abbe Lowell, last seen defending Hunter Biden against all manner of outrageous allegations from traitorous buffoons in Congress. Between Lemon and Lowell, there’s enough star power to light up any courtroom, if that’s where Bondi wants to go.

But trial or no trial, Lemon will surely be the most visible of what I’m now calling “The St. Paul Nine” — the three activists, two journalists, two political candidates, and two as yet unnamed defendants — all of whom have been arrested and indicted by Bondi’s stooges at DOJ. But let’s start at the beginning.

The purpose of the Cities Church protest was obvious: an agonized public response to the murder of Renée Good (Alex Pretti was not, as yet, dead). The organizers were known activists, experienced at making “good trouble,” and they chose that particular church when they found out that its pastor was leading a double life as, yes, an ICE field director. Imagine that, the perfect MAGA operative — church and state in the same asshole.

Can you think of a better metaphor for the entire Trump era, where atrocities routinely go hand in hand with religious piety? When you think about it, it’s all quite efficient: love thy neighbor on Sunday, arrest her on Monday, deport her whole family on Tuesday. Just as Christ taught.

Anyway, the protesters marched into the church, interrupting the service, but obstructing no entrances — a salient point, as we’ll see. They brought in the press, including Don Lemon, and plenty of phones. They waved signs, chanted slogans, and generally observed the classic rituals of civil disobedience, little changed since Gandhi and Martin Luther King first used them to alter history. The only difference being the phones.

But for all that planning and visibility, the whole episode was over and done with in 20 minutes. Left alone, it might have been just another demonstration flushed down the memory hole. Instead, Pam Bondi swung into action. Needing to make an example, in classic police-state fashion, she had three of the organizers arrested later that week.

These included Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights attorney whose before-and-after arrest photos might just live forever in the annals of fascist propaganda:

Her original mugshot, posted by DHS, showed her with a calm but mildly defiant expression, not at all surprised to be in custody.

A second mugshot, posted 30 minutes later by the White House, was digitally altered to make her skin darker and her overall appearance disturbed, with tears running down her face.

So let’s stop right here and consider the implications of that faked photo. This was, after all, an official, on-the-record communication of our federal government. In an age of AI, deepfakes, Russian bots, and a shamefully corrupted media, we need that government to be fighting disinformation, not spreading it.

Instead, with that one photo, our government is communicating, loud and clear, that nothing it says or does can be taken seriously, let alone trusted. That it will bend reality in any way that suits it. That it doesn’t give a shit if we believe it or not. That bad faith is the only faith on offer, take it or leave it.

The St. Paul Nine have all been indicted for this fiendish brandishing of signs, slogans, and smartphones. They’ve all been charged by Bondi with violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, a law explicitly designed to protect abortion clinics. Say what?

Yes, the FACE Act, as it’s known, was passed at a time when abortion clinics were regularly subjected to intimidation, violence, and occasional assassination. Then, as now, Democrats in Congress wanted strict protections for women entering these clinics. Then, as now, Republicans wanted abortion doctors executed and women enslaved, though they didn’t say that out loud back then. Instead they insisted on extending the same protections to other types of healthcare facilities, including those scammy “crisis pregnancy centers” that have sprouted like poison ivy since the fall of Roe.

But they also added houses of worship to the list of protected properties. Which seemed a non sequitur at the time, but not anymore. The FACE Act indeed covers the obstruction of access to a church, and Pam Bondi has a church in mind.

Part of the subtext here is that Trump has long wanted to walk back those abortion clinic protections, because cruelty to women is important to him. Just last year he pardoned 23 anti-abortion zealots who’d been convicted under the FACE Act, and his pet Supreme Court might yet have something game-changing to say on the subject one day soon.

For now, it’s enough to know that the FACE Act was already a flashpoint in the abortion wars, well before Bondi decided to weaponize it. Now she’s using it to go after both civil rights activists (euphemism for Black people) and members of the press (Lemon and Georgia Fort, the other journalist arrested).

The FACE Act has rarely been invoked in the context of a church. The law is about obstruction, after all, and who obstructs entrance to a church? Certainly not the St. Paul Nine. They are all on video, conspicuously not obstructing anyone. This will surely come up at trial, if there is one.

But Bondi seems to think the FACE Act is a winner. It’s a federal statute, carrying federal penalties. It sidesteps any messy First Amendment issues. And it lets her deflect the problem by making it about protecting worshippers, as opposed to arresting five-year-olds and murdering civilians.

She’s assuming there are enough judges out there willing to tolerate such legally dubious bullshit, this at a time when even Trump-appointed judges are clearly not in the mood. So it’s hard to escape the feeling that Bondi has no idea what she’s doing, that her entire purpose in life is to jump through any hoop her dementia-addled boss puts in front of her that day. This is not a secure career path.

Still she’s forging ahead. Never mind that her optics are terrible, that her moves tend to backfire, that her indictments are unlikely to stick, or that she routinely violates as many laws as she prosecutes.

Never mind that the St. Paul Nine seem to have all the chops they need to run rings around her in the media, and probably in the courtroom.

And speaking of courtrooms, if there’s really to be a trial in Don Lemon’s future, it’s worth noting that Abbe Lowell eats idiots like Pam Bondi for lunch.

 

 

Comments

  1. I think that you are missing the point. These activities are designed to be outrageous. The regime continues to push the boundaries of outrageousness in order to find the breaking point at which a peacefully protesting citizenry turns violent.

    Eventually, they will revert to the old strategy of bringing in their own violent actors, but for now, they are just having some fun seeing how far they can push it.

    The only real way to stop the next election is martial law. We're dancing on the head of a pin to avoid it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure what point I'm missing, but yes, much of this is designed for outrage. Thing is, it's not very well designed. There's nothing that makes me think there's some master plan here -- quite the contrary, I'm seeing a lot of idiots trying to walk back their idiocy in the face of the reality they idiotically helped create. The junta might raise the violence level, it's true, but even if they're prepared to go full-blown police state, I'm not not sure they have the chops to pull it off.

      Delete
    2. As near as I can tell, there are only two ways to stop this asshat from doing whatever they tell him to do: Article 25 or impeachment. That only works if the chickenshit Republicans in the senate go along.

      Do, yeah, why not martial law?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Farmers are Being Seriously Messed With

L et me say, right up front, that my knowledge of agriculture is minimal. Food grows in supermarkets. But I have done some homework to back up a suspicion of mine, which is that in terms of existential peril wrought by the Trump regime, there is no single group — with the glaring exception of our immigrant population — being bludgeoned as cruelly as the nation's farmers. Yes, there is deep irony in knowing that farmers voted overwhelmingly for Trump, many of them three times. Yes, it’s another FAFO moment — one of many coming fast and furious now. The problem is that we’re talking about our food supply here. We need those farmers — dumbshit Trump voters or not — to keep growing stuff for us to eat too much of. So it is of some concern to all of us that farm bankruptcies are up 36% since Trump took office. Underlying that figure is the grim fact that the market prices of virtually every major crop grown in this country are lower than the costs required to gr...

The Streisand Effect Comes for CBS News

       In 2003, Barbra Streisand — an artist I have long admired — made a ridiculous mistake, one that has echoed through the years. Annoyed that her cliff-top mansion in Malibu had been photographed from the air, and that the resulting photo had been posted online, she decided her privacy had been invaded. So in a fit of pique that we mere mortals can never hope to comprehend, she sued the photographer for $50 million. Never mind that the photo was one of many in an arcane technical collection that was documenting the erosion of the Malibu cliffs. Never mind that if you look at that photo today you wonder how the mansion hasn’t collapsed into the Pacific by now. And never mind that the lawsuit was quickly thrown out of court by a judge who then dinged Streisand for $177,000 in attorney’s fees. Forget all that. What matters about this incident is that before she filed the lawsuit, the photo had been viewed exactly six times online. Once the l...

The Epstein Files and Those Lingering Doubts

  My mother idolized Leon Botstein. She followed both his careers — as president of her beloved Bard College, and as the world-class conductor of the American Symphony. He has always been an impressive figure. I met him myself on two occasions. Once was at a Bard fund-raiser in Florida, where he was as attentive to my pre-teen sons as he was to my mother, whose annual donations were probably in the high two figures. The other time was at a talk he gave at the Romanian consulate in New York, on the subject of a rather obscure Romanian composer. He’s that kind of guy. So when Botstein’s name surfaced in the Epstein files, it got my attention. My first thought was that I was glad my mother didn’t live to see it. But then I thought about what her likely reaction might have been. Knowing Mom, I’m quite sure she would have defended him. She would have needed convincing beyond the collection of emails in the files, emails that are, in themselves, far from incrimi...