Skip to main content

Don Lemon and the St. Paul Nine are Headed for Prime Time

 

     As Bleeding Minnesota continues to dominate both the news and our consciousness, there’s one episode that especially embodies the utter madness of the cultural spasm playing out in front of us.

The January 18th protest at the Cities Church in St. Paul has everything you’d want in a Trump-era legal crisis: institutional incompetence, political gaslighting, ostentatious cruelty, and bad faith everywhere you look. All the hits.

Already, Pam Bondi is in way over her head, but that’s not stopping her. In her latest overreach, she arrested Don Lemon, last Friday, for his attendance as a journalist at that protest. If the stakes and the visibility weren’t already high enough, charging Lemon pushes them through the roof.

I’m guessing Lemon planned for this. His brand has been more-or-less in limbo since his racially-tinged purge by CNN two years ago, and he knows that Trump, like dictators everywhere, lusts to see reporters stand trial.

Apparently Lemon thinks poking the bear is a good career move. Being a reporter, Black, and gay makes him a walking trifecta of things Trump hates. This is certainly raising his profile, but risk-free it is not.

Whatever his motives, Lemon lawyered-up in advance. He hired Abbe Lowell, last seen defending Hunter Biden against all manner of outrageous allegations from traitorous buffoons in Congress. Between Lemon and Lowell, there’s enough star power to light up any courtroom, if that’s where Bondi wants to go.

But trial or no trial, Lemon will surely be the most visible of what I’m now calling “The St. Paul Nine” — the three activists, two journalists, two political candidates, and two as yet unnamed defendants — all of whom have been arrested and indicted by Bondi’s stooges at DOJ. But let’s start at the beginning.

The purpose of the Cities Church protest was obvious: an agonized public response to the murder of Renée Good (Alex Pretti was not, as yet, dead). The organizers were known activists, experienced at making “good trouble,” and they chose that particular church when they found out that its pastor was leading a double life as, yes, an ICE field director. Imagine that, the perfect MAGA operative — church and state in the same asshole.

Can you think of a better metaphor for the entire Trump era, where atrocities routinely go hand in hand with religious piety? When you think about it, it’s all quite efficient: love thy neighbor on Sunday, arrest her on Monday, deport her whole family on Tuesday. Just as Christ taught.

Anyway, the protesters marched into the church, interrupting the service, but obstructing no entrances — a salient point, as we’ll see. They brought in the press, including Don Lemon, and plenty of phones. They waved signs, chanted slogans, and generally observed the classic rituals of civil disobedience, little changed since Gandhi and Martin Luther King first used them to alter history. The only difference being the phones.

But for all that planning and visibility, the whole episode was over and done with in 20 minutes. Left alone, it might have been just another demonstration flushed down the memory hole. Instead, Pam Bondi swung into action. Needing to make an example, in classic police-state fashion, she had three of the organizers arrested later that week.

These included Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights attorney whose before-and-after arrest photos might just live forever in the annals of fascist propaganda:

Her original mugshot, posted by DHS, showed her with a calm but mildly defiant expression, not at all surprised to be in custody.

A second mugshot, posted 30 minutes later by the White House, was digitally altered to make her skin darker and her overall appearance disturbed, with tears running down her face.

So let’s stop right here and consider the implications of that faked photo. This was, after all, an official, on-the-record communication of our federal government. In an age of AI, deepfakes, Russian bots, and a shamefully corrupted media, we need that government to be fighting disinformation, not spreading it.

Instead, with that one photo, our government is communicating, loud and clear, that nothing it says or does can be taken seriously, let alone trusted. That it will bend reality in any way that suits it. That it doesn’t give a shit if we believe it or not. That bad faith is the only faith on offer, take it or leave it.

The St. Paul Nine have all been indicted for this fiendish brandishing of signs, slogans, and smartphones. They’ve all been charged by Bondi with violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, a law explicitly designed to protect abortion clinics. Say what?

Yes, the FACE Act, as it’s known, was passed at a time when abortion clinics were regularly subjected to intimidation, violence, and occasional assassination. Then, as now, Democrats in Congress wanted strict protections for women entering these clinics. Then, as now, Republicans wanted abortion doctors executed and women enslaved, though they didn’t say that out loud back then. Instead they insisted on extending the same protections to other types of healthcare facilities, including those scammy “crisis pregnancy centers” that have sprouted like poison ivy since the fall of Roe.

But they also added houses of worship to the list of protected properties. Which seemed a non sequitur at the time, but not anymore. The FACE Act indeed covers the obstruction of access to a church, and Pam Bondi has a church in mind.

Part of the subtext here is that Trump has long wanted to walk back those abortion clinic protections, because cruelty to women is important to him. Just last year he pardoned 23 anti-abortion zealots who’d been convicted under the FACE Act, and his pet Supreme Court might yet have something game-changing to say on the subject one day soon.

For now, it’s enough to know that the FACE Act was already a flashpoint in the abortion wars, well before Bondi decided to weaponize it. Now she’s using it to go after both civil rights activists (euphemism for Black people) and members of the press (Lemon and Georgia Fort, the other journalist arrested).

The FACE Act has rarely been invoked in the context of a church. The law is about obstruction, after all, and who obstructs entrance to a church? Certainly not the St. Paul Nine. They are all on video, conspicuously not obstructing anyone. This will surely come up at trial, if there is one.

But Bondi seems to think the FACE Act is a winner. It’s a federal statute, carrying federal penalties. It sidesteps any messy First Amendment issues. And it lets her deflect the problem by making it about protecting worshippers, as opposed to arresting five-year-olds and murdering civilians.

She’s assuming there are enough judges out there willing to tolerate such legally dubious bullshit, this at a time when even Trump-appointed judges are clearly not in the mood. So it’s hard to escape the feeling that Bondi has no idea what she’s doing, that her entire purpose in life is to jump through any hoop her dementia-addled boss puts in front of her that day. This is not a secure career path.

Still she’s forging ahead. Never mind that her optics are terrible, that her moves tend to backfire, that her indictments are unlikely to stick, or that she routinely violates as many laws as she prosecutes.

Never mind that the St. Paul Nine seem to have all the chops they need to run rings around her in the media, and probably in the courtroom.

And speaking of courtrooms, if there’s really to be a trial in Don Lemon’s future, it’s worth noting that Abbe Lowell eats idiots like Pam Bondi for lunch.

 

 

Comments

  1. I think that you are missing the point. These activities are designed to be outrageous. The regime continues to push the boundaries of outrageousness in order to find the breaking point at which a peacefully protesting citizenry turns violent.

    Eventually, they will revert to the old strategy of bringing in their own violent actors, but for now, they are just having some fun seeing how far they can push it.

    The only real way to stop the next election is martial law. We're dancing on the head of a pin to avoid it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure what point I'm missing, but yes, much of this is designed for outrage. Thing is, it's not very well designed. There's nothing that makes me think there's some master plan here -- quite the contrary, I'm seeing a lot of idiots trying to walk back their idiocy in the face of the reality they idiotically helped create. The junta might raise the violence level, it's true, but even if they're prepared to go full-blown police state, I'm not not sure they have the chops to pull it off.

      Delete
    2. As near as I can tell, there are only two ways to stop this asshat from doing whatever they tell him to do: Article 25 or impeachment. That only works if the chickenshit Republicans in the senate go along.

      Do, yeah, why not martial law?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The GOP’s YOLO Caucus Tentatively Pokes the Bear

   We now understand that congressional Republicans are not happy, the poor dears. As with everyone who has ever bought anything from Donald Trump, they have buyers’ remorse. Put another way, they sold their souls to Donald Trump, and got nothing from the sale. Trump screwed them on both the buy and sell sides. That hasn’t stopped them from cravenly rubber-stamping anything the Dear Leader wishes, even when they hate the idea. They’ve gone along with the stupid wars, the grifty tariffs, the plummeting economy, the ballooning inflation, the crazy gas prices, the degrading of our arsenal, the looting of our treasury, and the sabotage of our traditional alliances. All of which was fine with them. But it turns out the “Retribution Tour” was a bridge too far, even for the slavishly servile. Trump went out of his way to primary any Republican who ever crossed him, and a lot of long-time rubber stamps will now lose their seats as a result. This was not going down...

Gerrymanders, Dummymanders, and Why Panic is Totally Uncalled For

    Panic is sometimes unavoidable, but it’s almost never useful. Which is why we all have to chill about the gerrymander problem and appreciate the position in which we continue to sit. From all indications, the coming midterms will be a wave election, where we can expect people to be voting Democratic in overwhelming numbers. And in a wave election, all bets are off. No district will be safe for Republicans, no matter how cynically it’s been molested by gerrymander. I wasn’t planning to talk about the current orgy of redistricting now taking place in the wake of the odious Callais decision, but then I encountered, in the New York Times, a succession of above-the-fold articles that spiked my blood pressure. Once again, the Times has fallen back on the tired old Democrats-in-disarray model for its framing, the better to scare the clicks out of their readers. Here is one of the headlines, and they’re all in the same vein: Democrats Searc...

The Trouble with Being Born

   This is a re-run of a piece I wrote in March 2024. While it cites some news that is now old, it speaks of conditions and policies that only grow worse. Some of it is now, in retrospect, chilling. When I wrote of “forensic gynecology” and how “incarceration and execution are not off the table,” I had no idea how soon they’d actually be on the table.   In a red state, it’s no great privilege to be born. Certainly not from a legal standpoint. Republican-run governments are highly protective of the unborn, and are now extending legal protection to frozen embryos, at least in Alabama. If you happen to be one of those far-from-born organisms, you now enjoy all the rights of a living child. It’s when you get yourself born that things get complicated. Not that you would then lose those rights, just that they’d be widely ignored, poorly enforced, and cynically violated. But as long as you stay unborn, you’ve got lots of rights you don’t need. In Alabama —...