Skip to main content

The Epstein Files Aren't Just About You-Know-Who

 

     It is now a virtual certainty that Pam Bondi’s corrupt DOJ will slow-walk the release of the Epstein files as long as it can, forever if possible. We have no way of knowing how that will play out.

But the excavation of Jeffrey Epstein’s entire life has become a mini-industry, and we now know a whole lot more than we did, even a few weeks ago. No, we don’t have a smoking gun — video of Trump, say, in bed with an underaged girl or two — and it’s possible there won’t be. But that doesn’t mean there hasn’t been some pretty juicy stuff jumping out of the files that have, despite Bondi’s best efforts, already been released.

It will take a while for the pieces to fall into place, but there are plenty of storylines for ambitious reporters to follow. I am expecting astonishing revelations, though they won’t necessarily involve Trump. The Trump evidence will mostly remain unavailable until something, or someone, pries it loose.

But in the meantime, we can savor, for example, the transcripts of three lawsuits filed in 2023, which taken together paint an extremely squalid picture of Epstein’s sex-trafficking business, and the role of a major bank in facilitating it.

The lawsuits were brought by several of Epstein’s victims, who named the bank, JP Morgan Chase —and its president at the time, Jes Staley — as defendants. They alleged that Staley, and by extension JP Morgan, played a shockingly complicit role in Epstein’s illegal operations. They treated Epstein as a privileged client, providing banking services that let him seamlessly buy, sell, transport, house and, when necessary, buy the silence of young women all over the world.

There is abundant evidence that Staley knew exactly what was going on in the Epstein organization, and may even have partaken of the product. Other executives at JP Morgan are alleged to have known of Epstein’s activities, especially after his first Florida conviction in 2008.

The suits were settled quietly, with JP Morgan agreeing to pay $395 million — lunch money, essentially — to settle with the victims.

Many thanks to Greg Olear for his exhaustive parsing of the transcripts from those lawsuits, and while I highly recommend his account of what was contained in them, it’s not so much the lawsuits themselves that interest me, as what Olear’s analysis may imply.

What follows is speculation, and should be taken as such.

I’m speculating that “Q,” as in “QAnon,” was onto something, sort of. There actually is, or at least seems to be, an international ring of elite pedophiles, whose wealth and connections shield them from the law. There was a market for Epstein’s services, and that market won’t have gone away.

The problem for Q — and for his brain-dead followers — is that the ring has nothing to do with Democrats in general, or the Clintons in particular. As I’ve written before, the real pedophiles are all on the right, and so far there’s nothing in the Epstein files to suggest otherwise. No doubt there are a few degenerate Democrats in amongst Epstein’s customers, but nobody is trying to shield them from the law.

For roughly the first half of his career, Epstein was a wildly successful financial swindler, and we know how he somehow milked a rather large fortune from Les Wexner, the Victoria’s Secret founder. In that time, Epstein may have had a taste for both underaged girls and blackmail, but it wasn’t until he hooked up with Ghislaine Maxwell that he would turn his personal kinks into a business model.

Ghislaine was the right person for the job. Her father was the late Robert Maxwell — media mogul, member of Parliament, notorious fraudster — who drowned, in curious circumstances that I won’t get into, in 1991.

Ghislaine’s daddy had long enjoyed sketchy ties to Russian intelligence, Israeli intelligence, and organized crime bosses all over the world. He was once partners with Semion Mogilievich, “Boss of Bosses” of the Russian Mafia, whom the FBI once labelled “the most dangerous man in the world.” Fun fact: He was an early investor and apartment owner in Trump Tower.

Mogilievich was known for his business and financial acumen. He understood the practical benefits of international banking, and saw no reason why organized crime should be excluded from enjoying them. In a kleptocracy like Russia’s, it was a relatively simple matter for a sophisticated criminal overlord to take over a private bank, Inkombank, and gain access to the entire global financial system.

The world was now his laundry. Through Inkombank and related acquisitions, he was able to take dirty money from dozens of international criminal enterprises — drugs, weapons, extortion, contract murder, and, yes, sex-trafficking — and have it all come out squeaky clean.

At 79, Mogilievich is — against all odds for someone with his resume — still alive. He reportedly enjoys a comfortable retirement in Moscow, out of reach of Western law enforcement. He is thought to be protected personally by Putin, who is himself a sort of Mogilievich protégé.

While the Mogilievich-Maxwell partnership is well known, it’s not clear whether it involved sex-trafficking. Even so, we can make the educated guess that Ghislaine learned the trade somewhere, and Daddy’s knee comes to mind. We can further guess that Epstein — who met the Maxwells just before Daddy died — was eager to pick her brains.

History will record that the enterprise they created together was vast in scope, lavishly financed, and — as with everything that’s Trump-adjacent — steeped in organized crime. There are clear connections to the Russian mafia, which means there are clear connections to Putin.

Knowing what we know now about the extent of Russian meddling over the last decade, the role of Russian banks in Trump’s first election begs to be further explored. Remember the Alfa Bank server that was talking to the Trump organization in 2016? We still don’t know what that was about. There are hundreds of Trump-Russia questions that remain unanswered, and hundreds of dots still waiting to be connected.

Which is why, for some time now, Sen. Ron Wyden (D) of Oregon has been demanding that Congress follow the money in all matters involving Epstein. He has called for investigations into $1.5 billion in Epstein-related transactions that passed through four banks:  the aforementioned JP Morgan Chase, as well as Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, and — no surprise here — Deutsche Bank. I’m guessing he’ll find abundant connections to Russia and organized crime.

Meanwhile, the files will continue to dribble out. Wyden’s staff and reporters galore will continue to scrutinize them. The money trail will get easier to follow, and the full scope of Epstein’s international connections will eventually come into focus. Or not.

Either way, I’m guessing Sen. Wyden will be providing much entertainment this year.

Comments

  1. Given that a lot of people already assume that Trump is a pedophile, it's likely that they wouldn't go to such great lengths as to openly defy the law for that. Now, being a Russian puppet? That's treason. If it comes out, even the congresspeople he's blackmailing into supporting him will have to convict him, lest they be implicated.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gerrymanders, Dummymanders, and Why Panic is Totally Uncalled For

    Panic is sometimes unavoidable, but it’s almost never useful. Which is why we all have to chill about the gerrymander problem and appreciate the position in which we continue to sit. From all indications, the coming midterms will be a wave election, where we can expect people to be voting Democratic in overwhelming numbers. And in a wave election, all bets are off. No district will be safe for Republicans, no matter how cynically it’s been molested by gerrymander. I wasn’t planning to talk about the current orgy of redistricting now taking place in the wake of the odious Callais decision, but then I encountered, in the New York Times, a succession of above-the-fold articles that spiked my blood pressure. Once again, the Times has fallen back on the tired old Democrats-in-disarray model for its framing, the better to scare the clicks out of their readers. Here is one of the headlines, and they’re all in the same vein: Democrats Searc...

Let’s Just Call It Bozo Diplomacy

  “Peace talks” are usually plural — I can’t remember any war where there was just one, singular peace talk. Until now. One peace talk, one failure. The Vance delegation — is that an oxymoron? — picked up its toys and went home. They came back with nothing. Which is no more than what we deserve. I’m uncomfortable writing “we” in the context of some Trump-caused calamity, so please do not construe it as an endorsement of any word or deed being carried out in my country’s name. Take it to mean merely the “American side” of some international embarrassment. “We” is not me. I have no say in what “we” do. And the people who do have a say are idiots. At least I get to watch. We’ve arrived at the bargaining stage of the stupidest war in the nation’s history. How we got here is disgraceful. Whatever we come away with, however humiliating, serves us right. But whatever happens, it’s clear that we’re negotiating from weakness. We’re weak because we’ve been weakened ...

All Roads Lead to Putin, and They’re Getting Bumpy

  Back in the days when there was still a filter, sort of, on Trump’s brain, Nancy Pelosi tried to explain his inexplicable behavior on the world stage, famously concluding that “All roads lead to Putin.” Nothing has changed. The same questions about Trump and Putin that we’ve had since 2015 remain unresolved, which doesn’t mean they haven’t been answered. They have indeed been answered, and in painstaking detail. It’s just that they’ve been neither acknowledged in the legacy media, nor pursued by law enforcement. Trump is, has been, and always will be doing Putin’s bidding. It’s hard to think of any move made by Trump and his toadies that hasn’t in some way been helpful to Putin and harmful to us. Almost as if Putin planned it that way. The list of these betrayals is endless, and most of us know the obvious ones, though it will take decades to unravel the less obvious ones. Still, everything Trump has done fits the basic pattern: bad for us, good for Putin....