Skip to main content

The Best Place for a Playground Bully is On Camera

 

    Turns out, one of the hardest parts of watching my country descend deeper and deeper into darkness is the sheer embarrassment of it all. We’ve been reduced to a unique blend of stupidity and malevolence, and the rest of the civilized world doesn’t know whether to laugh at us or cry. Neither do I.

My Canadian cousins and friends have real reason to fear the deranged impulses of a monster acting in the name of my country — and by extension, me — and I’m powerless to help them. I can tell them it’s ludicrous to think Trump would invade Canada, but do I really believe that? America is behaving like a playground bully with a nuclear arsenal, so I don’t know what I believe anymore.

The Venezuela thing is mind-blowing on many levels, but I think it’s helpful to see it, not so much for what it is, as for what it’s not.

Most of all, it’s not about oil. No matter how much bluster Trump brings to the subject, Venezuelan oil is not something the energy industry is clamoring for. It’s too thick, it’s too expensive to process, and it doesn’t break even until the world price reaches $82 a barrel. The current price is around $58, and it’s not expected to go up much in the near future.

Beyond that, Venezuela’s pumping and refining infrastructure is falling apart, and needs roughly $100 billion in upgrades. That’s a lot of money to invest in a country with a crippled economy, an unstable government, and a history of nationalizing oil assets.

Best-case scenario, it would take ten years to restore Venezuela’s oil industry, and by then the entire petroleum era could be over. Trump might strong-arm a few oil executives into coughing up a few billion, but it won’t be because they think it’s a good idea.

That’s not stopping Trump from trying. A few days ago, he called his petro-buddies to the White House, and in true huckster form, he promised them such a deal on Venezuelan oil as you wouldn’t believe! Thicker than peanut butter! Totally unmarketable! But it’s an absolute steal at $100 billion! A steal like you’ve never seen! Many people say it’s the biggest steal ever! Major credit cards accepted.

Yes, there are oil magnates — Paul Singer, for example, who bought Chevron just in time to pick up an extra billion he doesn’t need — who will make a shitload from this disaster. But it will be more from stock manipulation and various financial maneuvers than from actual barrels in an actual marketplace.

So no, the invasion is not about oil. Nor is it about drugs. Maduro was indeed involved in drug trafficking, but only as a link in the cocaine route from Colombia to Europe. Venezuela’s impact on the U.S. drug market is negligible, and does not involve fentanyl. Or unarmed fishing vessels.

So why the invasion?

The answer, I’m afraid, comes down bullying. It’s about grownups who like to blow things up and kill people for fun and profit. It’s not 3D chess. It’s not world domination. There’s no discernible plan beyond dick-waving and intimidation.

Which is not to say those of us with especially dirty minds can’t imagine something darker. We have no idea how the invasion will play out on the ground, but at some point, the Hegseths and Millers might see this as an opportunity to get the military comfortable with shooting civilians. Caracas  could end up being a training ground for the invasion of, say, Chicago or New York.

But with all the vapid punditry surrounding the Venezuela fiasco, the one story we’re not getting so much as a whiff of is the military’s reaction to what they’re being asked to do.

It’s a question that affects everyone in the armed forces, from the high command to the lowliest grunt. We already know of one admiral who resigned, apparently in connection with the sinking of the aforementioned fishing vessels. We already know of the six Democratic veterans who went on record to warn military personnel about their obligation to reject illegal orders.

Everyone will be under tremendous pressure to do the wrong thing. So the question becomes how much wrong are they willing to do before the slope gets too slippery?

The military always has a handful of guys — yes, they’re always guys — who are there because they get to blow things up and kill people. To them, that’s what economists call psychic income. But I believe that most of the military, officers and enlisted alike, take this democracy stuff fairly seriously.

Most professional soldiers will understand what’s happening. They might cross over to the dark side — some might even go there willingly — but they’ll be under no illusions about what they’re doing. They’ll know what a war crime is before they commit one, and they’ll be aware of the consequences they could face down the road, in some less criminal administration.

So will they turn their guns on fellow citizens? That’s always been hard to imagine, but the murder of Renee Nicole Good in Minnesota leaves that question uncomfortably open.

Still, it’s somewhat encouraging to know that if — or when — American troops are deployed on American soil, they will face an unrelenting barrage of smartphones. Every move they make will be recorded, both for posterity and for evidence.

Last week in this space, I threw a lot of shade on smartphones, and rightly so. I blamed them for the dumbing down of our populace, and I’ll stand by that.

But at the same time, smartphones are playing a pivotal role in resisting the bullies. The videos they so universally enable might just be the worst thing that has ever happened to fascist propaganda.

When Good was killed, the usual ghouls — Noem, Vance, Fox pundits, Trump himself — were quick to jump in with the usual lies. Such was their sense of impunity that they didn’t even bother to check on the actual facts. Unfortunately for them, those facts — verified in a dozen videos — ensured that no amount of bullshit spin would gain traction with any but the most brain-dead MAGA zombies. And even they will have a hard time denying their own eyes.

As the ICE raids grow more brazen, and as the resistance to them grows more organized, much of that resistance will be people bearing witness by shooting video. I expect the same thing will be happening in Venezuela, in Iran, and in any country where bullies have the upper hand.

Because if there’s one thing we’ve learned — ever since the George Floyd murder five years ago — it’s that the best thing you can do with bullies is put them on camera.

 

Comments

  1. Maybe Trump is a bully, but Miller is downright nefarious. It seems pretty clear to me that these increasingly outrageous activities are designed to get the American people to protest violently.

    Once we cross that line, the regime will have probable cause to invoke the Insurrection Act. THAT'S when the military will need to make the tough call about whether they will back the coup or not.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Double Standards, Foreign and Domestic

   I’m writing today on two subjects that don’t have much in common: Democrats and Ukraine. I bring them together only to discuss the double standards they each, in their own way, are forced to deal with. The two situations are in no way equivalent — Ukraine being in far more peril — but they do have parallels. We all know how Democrats are expected to maintain the moral high ground, to impeccably observe ethical norms that feel almost quaint in the age of Trump. This is also true of Ukraine and Putin, but we’ll get to that. Republicans, of course, are expected to be omnivorously corrupt. The self-dealing and grand larceny barely raise eyebrows in the media these days. If it isn’t about the Communist takeover of the Democratic Party, it isn’t news. Even so, Democrats largely live up to the higher standard, foolish as that sometimes seems, and are still quick to remove anyone who’s not squeaky clean from their ranks. Republicans, of course, have unlimited l...

Move to the Center, My Ass

   This piece isn’t that old, but it bears repeating. It was written in the immediate aftermath of last year’s off-year elections, when Democrats made an unusually strong showing, which according to the legacy media was a sign of weakness. Now, as we enter the silly season leading up to November, that same media can be counted on to make the midterms seem like a contest between two legitimate entities. Already the stories feature Democrats hopelessly, and haplessly, locked in ideological struggles that threaten their ability to walk and chew gum, mostly because the Trumpian apocalypse story is getting old. If it seems like we’ve heard all this too many times before, I’m with you. And as you’ll see, I’ve even written about it.   In the run-up to last Tuesday’s election, it was hard to avoid the overpaid pundits repeating the oldest and laziest clichés in the pundit handbook: “Democrats need to move to the center.” “Democrats are out of touch with voters....

Abdul El-Sayed and the Start of Silly Season

   We’re not yet officially in the “silly season,” that cascade of bullshit that will dominate what passes for political discourse between Labor Day and the November midterms. But as with Christmas, the silly season comes earlier and earlier with each election cycle, and one could argue that it kicked off unofficially last Tuesday, with the Michigan primary. The silliness was, as usual, aided and abetted by the New York Times, in a series of disingenuous takes on the narrow victory of Abdul El-Sayed over Haley Stevens in the race for the Democratic Senate nomination. The Times’ started hyperventilating over the rise of El-Sayed weeks ago, strongly echoing its equally biased misreading of the rise of Zohran Mamdani. Both candidates were Muslims with funny names who weren’t afraid to speak the word ‘socialist’ out loud. Even worse — even more likely to make the Times’ editorial board queasy — they were both willing to openly blast the conventional wisdom abo...