Skip to main content

The Take-Down of Jimmy Carter Stinks to This Day

 

Back when Republicans were just starting to discover the political uses of deception, propaganda, and dirty tricks, one could argue that Jimmy Carter was the first real notch on their belt.

Carter’s rise — from way out in left field to the White House — is well-chronicled, and I won’t try to tell it here. But at the time, the GOP was reeling from the fall of Richard Nixon, the first in a long line of bad-faith Republicans whose bad faith does not improve with age.

It wasn’t just that Nixon had resigned in the face of his imminent removal from office. It was also that his Attorney General, his Chief of Staff, most of his lawyers, and a rogue’s gallery of underlings and dirty-tricksters had been convicted of felonies and sent to prison. The GOP had been exposed as a party happy to look outside the law for political gain, and they paid a heavy price for it.

That was then. Since then, they’ve done far worse, far more often, and caused far more damage, yet they’ve paid nothing.

This, of course, was before they learned how to launder their reputations — before Limbaugh, before Fox, before alternative facts were a thing. There was no cable, no internet, no social media, no efficient way to wash the brains of gullible rubes. All those things came later, but Republicans were plenty resourceful, even then.

Gerald Ford had become president by default. He’d been appointed — as opposed to elected — to the vice presidency when the appallingly corrupt Spiro Agnew took a plea deal and stepped down. Never more than an accidental president, Ford took over when Nixon resigned, and promptly pardoned him — an official act of lasting consequence that carries the stench of collusion even now. It did not go down well with large chunks of the American electorate.

Ford fumbled his way through an abbreviated term, then made a half-assed run for his own term in 1976. But by then, the whole country was sick of anyone tied to the Washington establishment, especially Republicans.

So the stage was set for an outsider, someone who’d never been in Congress or served in an administration. Someone who could ride in and speak for the pissed-off.

Jimmy Carter was a real populist, as opposed to a performative one. He was a peanut farmer from a one-horse town in Georgia, born without a racist bone in his body, which was saying something for that time and place.

An Annapolis graduate and naval engineer, he was smart, practical, and a thoroughly decent person, qualities he continued to demonstrate for the rest off his life. He went into politics as a champion for racial equality, and was eventually elected governor of Georgia. He was a complete unknown on the national stage, which made him just what the country seemed to be looking for in a president.

Astonishingly, in 1976, he emerged from a primary field of thirteen Democrats to win the nomination. How he beat Ford and won the general election is another long story I’m not going to tell.

But it was a real moment of hope for those of us looking for such moments. Sadly, that hope didn't last long. Republicans had their knives out Day One, and were waiting in the weeds for any misstep they could pounce on, just as they do today. And yes, Carter was somewhat out of his depth among the sharp elbows of Washington.

But what really did him in was a run of remarkably bad luck, and the GOP was right there to pile on the spin with every piece of bad news that came along.

To start with, Carter inherited a terrible economy. The nation had been traumatized by the Arab oil embargo of ’73-’74, when gasoline prices quadrupled overnight, and local gas shortages caused hours-long lines at the gas pump.

By the time Carter took over, oil prices were still being jacked up by the petro-states of the Mideast.  He faced double-digit inflation, high interest rates, high unemployment, and slow growth, a perfect storm of economic gloom. Even so, most economists agree Carter did an admirable job of navigating what had become a full-blown energy crisis.

But then came the Iranian revolution of 1979. Suddenly, the Shah of Iran — a bought-and-paid-for American puppet — was fleeing the country. Suddenly, a religious nutjob, the Ayatollah Khomeini, was returning from exile to run it. Suddenly, one of the world’s largest oil producers had become a radicalized Islamic state, and was calling for “Death to America.”

So when an Iranian mob overran the American embassy in Tehran, taking fifty-three diplomats and staff as hostages, the pressure on the Carter administration was amped up to eleven.

The hostages were held for 444 days — nearly a year and a half — and all attempts to get them released went awry. Negotiations, both direct and through intermediaries, failed across board. A rescue attempt went off the rails when a helicopter crashed in the desert, killing eight Marines. The whole world saw the crisis as the failure of a president now presumed, unfairly, to be feckless.

Even worse, this was happening in an election year, 1980, just as Carter was engaged in a brutal primary fight with Ted Kennedy. This caused bitter rifts in the Democratic party, just as the GOP was about to nominate the unspeakable Ronald Reagan.

Still, the hostages remained in Iran throughout the entire election cycle, and Republicans missed no opportunity to bludgeon Carter in the press.

Reagan was elected, ushering in a whole new chapter in Republican perfidy. And that chapter started immediately, on Reagan’s inauguration day, when Iran finally, and with great fanfare, announced the release of the hostages. This happy coincidence always smacked of political subterfuge, even as Republicans loudly proclaimed that Iran was just acting from fear of a “strong” president taking office.

Anyone with half a brain believed they had made a secret deal to delay the release until after the election, but the evidence was never there.

Until forty-three years later — just as Jimmy Carter was entering hospice — when the secret deal was finally confirmed. The story came out that John Connally — former governor of Texas, former Democrat, and, at that time, an active Reagan supporter — had made a tour of the Middle East in July 1980, just as the election cycle was ramping up. At each stop, he bent every influential ear he could find, seeking out back channels to the Iranian government. He was actively putting out the message that Iran would get a much better deal from Reagan than from Carter. Apparently, the message was received.

How many extra months were those hostages held, for reasons that were never anything but political?

The take-down of Jimmy Carter was an early indication that the lawlessness of the Nixon administration was neither a one-off, nor the work of a few bad apples.

It was Republicans embracing the dark side. We now know they were just getting started.

 

Comments

  1. So incredibly painful on so many levels! I've always loved Jimmy Carter, a real Christian in the true sense. I felt even in my young age, what was being done to him by some obscure power that was. It was infuriating than and the rage continues.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Every day during the Iran hostage crisis our local paper displayed a small text block counting the number of days the American hostage were being held in Iran. Something like "Day 175 for sixty-six American hostages in Iran". Every day! And as I recall the nightly TV news mentioned it every broadcast. I didn't think much of it at the time. But now it sure looks like the steady drum beat of "Hostages! Hostages!" was a behind-the-scenes Republican operation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Regarding those helicopters. I had a discussion with my uncle back in the later 80's. A retired Colonel originally of the Army Airforce, WW2. My dad's family spent time in Germany doing Army stuff. As I was told, helping get the scientist out.

    His take was that the military had divided up the planet such that each had their "playground" (his words). Each very protective of their turf. There were 2 types of helicopters. One was designed to swallow dirt in the engines, the other water. Being that the hostages were in the Navy's playground it was the water swallowing helicopters that were used. It was the sand that did the helicopters in as I recall.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Probably Not The Last Word on Charlie Kirk

  Kamala Harris is wired to be repulsed by the name of God. She mocks God. Again, everything Democrats love, God hates. Let me say that again: everything that Democrats love, God hates. And if you’re a Christian that votes [for] the Democrat Party, you are voting for things that God hates. That’s between you and God. Think about it. If you’re voting for the Democrat Party, you’re voting for stuff that God hates.  —Charlie Kirk,  “ The Charlie Kirk Show, ”  October 21, 2024   Let’s speak ill of the dead, shall we? Keith Olbermann now calls him “St. Charlie of Kirk,” and who could argue with a rapid canonization, given the deep piety of the statement above? It’s impossible for decent people to talk about Charlie Kirk’s assassination without starting the sentence with the obligatory “I condemn all forms of violence, but…” This is quickly followed by some watered-down version of Kirk that paints him as less loathsome in death than he was ...

The Rapture Disappoints Yet Again

T he Rapture has always struck me as the quintessence of religious crankery, right up there with snake handling and speaking in tongues. How does anyone get to a mindset where they’re absolutely positive that Jesus will be coming around this week and whisking them off to heaven? If you’re not familiar with the Rapture — or with Armageddon, the Second Coming, and the whole End Times theology — let’s bring you up to speed a bit. An Australian writer named Dan Foster has an excellent article on the subject, written from his own experience. Raised in a “Rapture culture,” he says he suffered from “Rapture anxiety” as a child. He defines the Rapture as: …a belief held by many evangelicals. It describes a sudden moment when all Christians, living and dead, will be taken up into heaven. According to this view, the faithful will escape the world before a long period of disaster and suffering begins for everyone left behind. The theology is based, loosely, on the B...

AR-15: The Must-Have Accessory for the Well-Dressed Republican

  I’m not ready to write about Charlie Kirk, and might decide not to. Either way, it won’t be this week, in which writing has been impossible. So let me return to a piece that I feel has some resonance at the moment, given the concurrent shootings of Kirk and of two school kids in Evergreen, Colorado, a town I once lived in. I posted this in April 2023, but its subject is timeless. Even when an AR-15 isn’t directly involved with some atrocity, its culture usually is. F or decades, a standard tactic of anti-abortion activists was to display, in as much gruesome detail as possible, photos of aborted fetuses. It was a vile tactic — an easy punch in the gut to the gullible and squeamish — but it’s hard to deny its effectiveness, or the inflammatory role it played in the culture wars. It was, in a way, a harbinger of the death of Roe v. Wade. Revulsion, whether we like it or not, is a real political tactic. An extreme tactic, to be sure, but it has its uses. Hold...