Skip to main content

Is Nikki Haley Working on a Take-Down of Trump?

 

Every now and then I like to engage in a bit of speculation. Not prediction, mind you, but something hopefully less presumptuous.

In this case, I’ve been musing about Nikki Haley’s path forward, if she has one.

Not whether she’ll win the nomination, which is unlikely. I’m more interested in her potential as an irritant, as a person ideally positioned to tamper with Trump’s fragile psyche. She now has the unmistakable opportunity to attack Trump from inside the Fox media bubble, something few have been able to do.

Haley just might be the focus of a novel strategy that does two things at once: It holds the door open for the slim chance she has of winning the nomination this summer, while at the same time, it lays the groundwork for a 2028 run at the presidency. Given the debased state of today’s Republican party, this is surely as good a strategy as any, though it risks doing more for Joe Biden than for her. More on this later.

For now, let’s presume that there’s a sizeable pot of money — right-wing, billionaire donor money — that’s prepared to support anybody who’s not Donald Trump. This is self-evident in the mere fact that Haley is still campaigning. Clearly, there are high-roller donors already invested in keeping her in the race, and there is much speculation about why that might be. I’m guessing that, at minimum, they see her as their only viable candidate if Trump’s campaign tanks.

But I’m also wondering if they might be playing a longer game. They could be looking ahead to life after Trump, by which time Haley might well be the last toilet-trained Republican out there.

Let’s further presume that getting rid of Trump is highly desirable to many, if not most, of these donors. They have wanted him gone forever, however much they’ve accommodated him in the past. To them, Trump is the loosest of cannons, and he’s already wreaked considerable damage on their party. It’s only a matter of time before he blows them all up, and they know it.

We’ll know more in the next week or two, but I think their strategy might be to have Haley go on the offensive, to embarrass Trump in front of his base, to subject him to ridicule wherever she can. If she has the will — and the continued backing — to go for a scorched-earth take-down of Trump, she’s in a unique position to do just that.

All she has to do is tell the truth about him in public, especially on Fox News.

She has already dipped her toe in this water. She has already publicly called Trump "totally unhinged.” She has already pointed to his increasingly obvious dementia. She has already drawn typically deranged responses from him. She continues to taunt him about refusing to debate her — something his handlers are desperate, for obvious reasons, to avoid.

These little apostasies are already more than enough to poison her standing with Trump, not to mention with his cult. Moreover, everything she’s done since the New Hampshire vote last week suggests that she knows her bridges are burned. She won’t be Trump’s running mate. She has no future at all in MAGA-world. Like Liz Cheney, she appears to have no choice but to go all-in on taking him down.

But unlike Cheney — whose appearances on CNN or MSNBC won’t sway a single voter — Haley has a real platform. Haley can go on Fox and deliver anti-Trump messaging directly to the Trump base. That has never before been possible, and the prospects are tantalizing.

Just think of the slime she can fling at him. Think of all the ridicule she can conjure just from the public record — no significant oppo research required. Think of all she can do to provoke him, to grab him by the ego and make him look stupid in front of his supporters. And she can do this in the language of the right-wing bubble.

She can tell them how Trump has twice been found liable for sexual assault by real juries. How his over-hyped businesses are about to be forfeited. How he stole nuclear secrets and played fast and loose with national security. How he planned and incited insurrection. How he’s happy to pull us out of NATO and sell Ukraine down the river.

And she can tell them exactly why he’ll be starring in multiple criminal trials that could put him in prison for multiple lifetimes.

These are all things that the Trump base has been shielded from, things they’ve either never heard, or refuse to believe. If she can use any or all of them to frame him as weak, senile, and broke, there’s no telling how many voters can be reprogrammed to believe her.

But the best part? She’ll be telling that same Fox audience much of what Democrats have wanted to tell them since 2016 — that Donald Trump is the world’s biggest loser. If that message alone could penetrate through the fog of Fox, Biden would get as much out it as Haley. Maybe more.

Keep in mind, no Democrat has ever had real access to the Fox platform, a hermetically-sealed bubble impervious to either logic or facts. Only carefully curated propaganda is allowed to get through to the Fox audience, which to this day knows precious little about Trump’s criminality. His impeachments, his indictments, his staggering financial liabilities, his failing businesses, and his apparent dementia are all, to them, breaking news.

But if anti-Trump messaging can be delivered by a Republican with the stature of Haley, and if she can deliver it robustly and repeatedly over the next few months, some of it is sure to sink in among some percentage of Fox viewers. And if she can manage to get enough voters thoroughly disgusted, some of them might just stay home on Election Day, or even vote for Joe Biden. Either way, it’s a win for Biden.

Haley is obviously aware of this possibility, and she has tried, clumsily, to “both sides” as many issues as she can, with mixed results.

On the “age” issue, it’s easy for her to lump Trump and Biden together as a pair of old farts, even as Trump’s cognitive decline becomes both more evident and more potentially damaging.

But when she turns on the gaslight and says, with a straight face, that Trump and Biden are “both being investigated,” you remember that it’s totally possible for her to despise Trump and still be a despicable person in her own right.

Haley’s campaign is not, ultimately, about her. She is simply the only candidate left for Republicans who can’t stand Trump, of whom there are many. In New Hampshire, almost half of primary voters rolled with that. If she chooses to go after Trump aggressively, there’s a chance she could get some real traction.

Or maybe not. I could be all wrong here. Haley could drop out of the race tomorrow. She could kiss Trump’s ring and beg his forgiveness. She could go out and campaign for him. But I don’t think so. Nor do I think she can keep up the craven deference that Trump was shown in all those cringe-worthy Republican debates.

I think her only way forward is to go full Chris Christie — to hit Trump hard, early and often. Halfway measures won’t get it done.

She has a unique opportunity. She can shine a light on Trump’s criminality. She can showcase his treason. She can turn his lies against him. She can show Republicans everywhere what a total slimeball he is.

Will the hardcore Trumpies care? No. Can she even pull it off? Who knows?

But you’ve got to admit, the very idea of Nikki Haley using Fox News to take a blowtorch to Trump — and of Democrats capitalizing on it — would be sheer poetry.

Comments

  1. And yet, God forbid, if she should actually succeed and win the nomination, she might even have a chance to beat Biden in the general election. I'd give her a better chance against Biden than Trump anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I didn't get into that. Too creepy to contemplate.

      Delete
  2. I think she should end every interview or posting with the phrase. "Perhaps it is time for God to call him home." It seems like God could solve this whole situation involving Trump.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This doesn't work without Fox's active cooperation. Any effect her appearances on that network have towards taking down Trump start to help Biden, and Biden alone, as soon as it becomes impossible for her to capture the nomination. At that point, which is probably Super Tuesday at the latest, a network that wants some R to win the general election is going to both stop letting her have access, and to start vilifying her. If they start the vilifying in March, that leaves them plenty of time to make her a non-=person within the Fox bubble. Her negative effect on Trump is discredited within the Fox universe, and she loses any chance to be the nominee in 2028.

    She can indeed carry on after it becomes clear she can't win, if she has those billionaires funding her, and I suspect that she could find at least a few who would do that. But she won't have access to the Fox bubble anymore. We already have the Lincoln Project producing and airing Trump take-downs -- from outside the Fox bubble so good luck getting any traction with MAGAts) -- and its not clear that a second such media effort could achieve any more than the Lincoln Project.

    It's not even entirely clear that Fox has the freedom to make this work even if it goes all in on taking down Trump. They have their own "talent" that likely would turn on them if they sold out Trump, and worse, they have OANN competing with them to be Trump's Ministry of Truth. Fox seemed to be headed towards dumping Trump for awhile there, but for the past year or so has fallen back in line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All good points, and it could all go down as you say. But I'm not sure the Murdochs are comfortable with Trump any more, especially with the expensive legal trouble he gets them into. Yes, Haley could disappear, but there will be more irritants. Even now Trump is picking a fight with Taylor Swift, which strikes me as the worst idea he's ever had. He's drawing her out of an apolitical posture and forcing her to respond. So far, she has stayed above the fray, but once the Super Bowl idiocy is out of the way, she just might take the gloves off, which won't be pretty. I don't think the GOP understands who they're messing with.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

France and Britain Just Gave the Finger to Fascism

There is now ample evidence that people with democratic systems of government actually like them, and would just as soon keep them, flaws and all. There seems to be a strong backlash occurring in several European countries, a trend toward shoring up democracies threatened by toxic authoritarian forces. In Poland last year, then in France and Britain last week, actual voters — as opposed to deeply compromised opinion polls — gave a big middle finger to the fascists in their midst. I don’t pretend to understand the electoral systems of these countries — let alone their political currents — but I’m struck by the apparent connections between different elections in different countries, and what they might be saying to us. I’ve spoken before of Poland , where ten years of vicious minority rule was overturned at the ballot box. A ban on abortion was the galvanizing issue — sound familiar? — and it brought an overwhelming number of voters to the polls, many for the fir

Don’t Let the New York Times Do Your Thinking

  My father would not live any place where the New York Times couldn’t be delivered before 7:00 a.m. To him, the Times was “the newspaper of record,” the keeper of the first drafts of history. It had the reach and the resources to be anywhere history was being made, and the skills to report it accurately. He trusted it more than any other news source, including Walter Cronkite. Like my dad, I grew to associate the Times with serious journalism, the first place one goes for the straight story. Their news was always assumed to be objectively presented, with the facts front-and-center. Their op-ed writers were well-reasoned and erudite, even when I thought they were full of shit. But there was more. The Times became — for me, at least — a sort of guide to critical thinking. It helped teach me, at an impressionable age, to weigh the facts before forming an opinion. And many of my opinions — including deeply-held ones — were formed around facts I might have read

Democrats, Step Away from the Ledge

  Anxiety comes easily to Democrats. We’re highly practiced at perceiving a crisis, wanting to fix it immediately, and being consistently frustrated when we can’t. Democrats understand consequences, which is why we always have plenty to worry about. Republicans don’t give a rat’s ass about consequences — which is, let’s face it, their superpower. I wasn’t intending to write about last Thursday’s debate, mostly because I post on Tuesdays, and this could be old news by the time it gets to you. But then the New York Times weighed in with a wildly disingenuous editorial calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race, and the rest of the mainstream media piled on. In the Times' not-so-humble opinion, Biden needs to consider “the good of the country,” something their own paper has repeatedly failed to do for almost a decade. And since this is now the crisis du jour for virtually every Democrat who watched that shitshow, I thought I might at l