Skip to main content

The Useful Idiot from Alabama

Nobody wears the words “useful idiot” quite like Tommy Tuberville, freshman senator from the benighted state of Alabama.

He’s been especially useful to Trump. Among all the MAGA loons Trump endorsed for high office in the 2020 election, Tuberville was one of the few successes. While that’s probably down more to Alabama’s brainwashed electorate than to any political skill on Trump’s part, Trump has owned him ever since.

He is known to have been on the other end of several suspicious Trump phone calls during the Jan 6 riot, and while there’s no indication that he’s on Jack Smith’s radar, there’s no sign that he isn’t, either.

Now Tuberville — a mediocre football coach turned white supremacy hero — has seized the world stage with his audacious hold on Senate approval of military appointments.

It isn’t often you hear bipartisan outrage these days, but there’s plenty for even Republicans to hate in this foolhardy stunt, this parliamentary sleight-of-hand  that carries such ominous implications for national security.

The normal Senate process for military promotions has traditionally allowed for approval of three hundred nominees at a time, give or take. Tuberville is, in effect, blackmailing the Senate into approving each officer individually, which would require more floor time than the Senate has available for the next several years.

There is no chance of that happening, but Tuberville’s antics are nonetheless gumming up Senate procedure, and that’s not even close to the biggest trouble he’s causing.

Because the appointments he’s holding up include positions crucial to national defense operations, up to and including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. When the current chair, Mark Milley, steps down in October, his position will stay vacant until the Senate approves his replacement. If that key position, and hundreds of those below that, can’t be approved as planned, their responsibilities would be carried out by “acting” appointments.

Under the law, acting officers can only fulfill the immediate duties of their office. They are forbidden from hiring staffers, from moving into assigned quarters, or from planning any future course for their units. It’s not clear how that works if there’s a war.

This is already causing big frustration in the officer corps. The people whose promotions are being held up are, generally, those with the most promising careers. They’re the ones who know they can earn much more in the private sector, and they’re no doubt thinking about that as they wait — months? years? — for their next promotion to come through. The process is slow enough in normal times.

And for every officer whose promotion is delayed, there are dozens, or even hundreds of people below them in the chain of command whose futures are now up in the air. They can’t know their next assignment. They can’t be sure where they’ll be living. Their families are in limbo, with no idea when they’ll have to move, or where their kids will go to school — and yes, it’s now September. Does this faze Tuberville even slightly?

It follows that this one-man bottleneck is creating serious anxiety among our allies — especially Ukraine, but also Japan, South Korea and all the NATO countries. All have come through the Trump years traumatized by the recklessness that seems built into our system, and they are deeply distrustful of our actions and motives going forward.

Now they’re seeing that, even in a Biden administration, they’ll be forced to deal with American “acting” commanders who aren’t empowered to make real decisions. Dictators the world over are cackling with glee.

Surely even Tuberville understands that. So you have to wonder why he’s doing what he’s doing.

Why indeed. Ostensibly, it’s about abortion, specifically about the military’s commitment to ensuring abortion access for women in the service, wherever they’re serving.

Tuberville wants that commitment rescinded. He is taking a principled stand for both male and white supremacy. He is personally committed to making forced birth just as mandatory for the military as it is for Alabama.

It’s bad enough that women in the armed forces can’t get abortions in many of the slave states they now serve in. But to then deny them abortion access in free states is more than just cruel. It’s a major disincentive to joining the service, and a compelling reason to leave it.

Military recruitment has fallen off in recent years, and the ability to attract — and even more important, retain — the qualified personnel they need is now focused, more and more, on women. But if female recruits can’t be guaranteed the kind of reproductive healthcare they get elsewhere, why would they enlist? Tuberville’s hold is actively turning them away.

But when I say this is “ostensibly” about abortion, it’s because I think abortion is just the cover story. Current wreckage notwithstanding, Tuberville’s real motives may be far darker.

I’m not the first to speculate that he aims to extend this hold through to the next election, at which time there’s a better-than-zero chance of Trump retaking the presidency.

In that event, Tuberville would have, by then, saved five or six hundred high-level military positions for Trump to fill. Just imagine the quality of applicant at that point.

It's the Mitch McConnell school of parliamentary sabotage. Whereas McConnell used a similar tactic to deprive Obama of a Supreme Court pick, Tuberville — or whatever brains are behind him — want to use it to make the military safe for fascism.

It’s hard to believe either Tuberville or Trump could come up with such a sophisticated scheme on their own. The idea of using the chaos around abortion as the smokescreen for a takeover of the military high command is, admittedly, brilliant — very Manchurian Candidate — but these guys aren’t that bright. Strings are surely being pulled.

So whose useful idiots are they? Who benefits from our military being undermined from within? Who benefits from a high command in disarray? Who benefits from the erosion of trust among our NATO allies? Who benefits from the inability of our military to meet its recruitment needs? Who benefits from seeding our officer corps with lackeys loyal only to the fuhrer?

The first name that comes to mind is Putin. And given Trump’s history in Putin’s service, it’s not a big leap to see Russian intelligence behind such a scheme, whether Tuberville knows it or not.

It’s in the nature of useful idiots to not fully understand either their usefulness or their idiocy. Tuberville’s hold on the military smells of kompromat, and I would like to think someone in the FBI has caught a whiff of it.

It is inexcusable that any one senator can, all by himself, hold up military nominations indefinitely. Whatever obscure Senate rule is being invoked by this traitor, it’s causing real damage in real time.

I don’t know how one changes such a rule, but I'm quite sure it was never intended for such crass and dangerous use. It’s hard to believe there aren’t bipartisan remedies for this, or the will to use them.

In the meantime, Tuberville will be the catalyst for disruption in the Pentagon, and for high-fives in the Kremlin.

Comments

  1. It's strange how people look back at historical atrocities and think "we would never let that happen to us. Then, they do...again!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The GOP's Weaknesses are More Apparent than its Strengths

  Anyone who’s paying attention now understands that this election is a whole lot scarier than it ever should have been. It’s a shame — and an indictment of our constitutional system — that it comes down to an election at all. Surely, the Trump problem should have been settled by now, with no further elections required to get him out of our lives. His crimes were such that the real crime was letting him remain at large. All those checks and balances we were taught to revere should have somehow found a way to rid us of this monster. But the Supreme Court seems to have Trump’s back, though it’s not clear what that gains them. If anything, it makes one wonder what Trump is holding over them, and what might happen to their families if they don’t keep him out of prison. So it will come down to the election, and the lines couldn’t be drawn more indelibly. I prefer to think this can work out well — that these scorched-earth hacks can be overwhelmed at the ballot box

The New York Times has Gone Over to the Dark Side

  A week or so ago, Trump took a break from the courtroom and held a rally in a picturesque corner of New Jersey, a state he has no hope of winning. His speech at this rally was even more unhinged than usual, featuring his now-famous tributes to Al Capone and Hannibal Lecter — the latter being as fictional as Trump’s medical records, but seemingly real in his mind. These speeches are growing worse over time, and they seem to betray a worsening cognitive condition. Unfortunately, the New York Times doesn’t see it that way. Their reporting of the event was basically a puff piece . To them, this rally was Trump’s well-deserved break from the rigors and indignities of his criminal trial. They marvel that, “after a long and tense week,” he could now head to the Jersey Shore for some much-needed rest and adulation: Against the backdrop of classic Americana, Mr. Trump repeated his typical criticism that Mr. Biden’s economic policies were hurting the middle class.

Trump and Pecker Sittin’ in a Tree

  Before there was Fox News, before there was Rush Limbaugh, before there was the sprawling rightwing ecosystem of fake news and vicious smears we so enjoy today, there was the National Enquirer . For most of our lives, the Enquirer stared up at us from the checkout aisle of our local supermarket. Somehow, we never made the connection that its readers would one day fit the stereotype of the Trump voter — under-educated, gullible, malleable, easy targets for disinformation. The Enquirer nurtured those targets over many decades, got them to believe virtually anything, and helped lay the groundwork for the sort of know-nothing insurgency that brought Trump into all our lives. Decades ahead of its time, the Enquirer was peddling fake news long before it was fashionable. It appealed unapologetically to humanity’s baser instincts, the ones most of us try to rise above. It was always flamboyantly sleazy, and always there in plain sight, something we could dependably