Skip to main content

Putin Lite: Republicans Ramp Up the Cruelty


This is a piece that, with a few edits, I could have written yesterday. It's from April 19, 2022, two months into the insane invasion of Ukraine, and little has changed since then. Putin has gotten worse. Republicans have gotten worse. Both are doubling down on their inhumanity. Both are paying a steep price for it. With all that in mind, I think the points made here might bear restating.


If there is but one lone favor Vladimir Putin is doing for the world, it’s that he’s setting an excellent bad example.

He is now the poster boy for the very worst humankind has to offer. No matter who or where you are, Putin presents you with a bright moral line, separating two crystal clear worldviews. Democracy or Autocracy.

There are no shades of gray here. You can no longer look at Putin and not know which side of the line you’re on.

Which is why it says a lot that so many Republicans can’t seem to decide.

While they might secretly cheer the wanton slaughter of entire cities, they also understand that endorsing so much carnage and death might be politically awkward, even for them.

The same conundrum is forcing them to defend democracy, which they’ve otherwise abandoned as not compatible with their ambitions, let alone those of their donors. And since the whole idea of democracy is now inextricably linked to Ukraine and the atrocities being endured there, Republicans are reluctantly sitting on their hands, afraid to say what they really think.

But make no mistake, they are smitten with the Putin model. Think of them as Putin Lite.

They love the idea of total control, of the power of life and death over other people. They dream of a world where cruelty and ruthlessness are state assets. Where there’s a brisk market for torturers and con artists. Where prisons are kept constantly filled with Blacks, immigrants, and Democrats.

They share the same basic values as Putin and, of course, Trump — male dominance, white supremacy, grand larceny — and they see Putin as the apotheosis of those values.

But more than that, Putin’s actions are showing them what’s possible. Not so much by what he’s doing to Ukraine, as what he’s doing to his own people.

They look on in envy at a Russian populace enthusiastically complicit in its own impoverishment, one that applauds its own exploitation and can be reprogrammed to applaud anything else at the flip of a switch.

They look longingly on a propaganda machine that allows no truth or factual content to intrude on any chosen narrative. They marvel at the swift and brutal retribution leveled at any form of dissent. They pray for a real police state they can call their own, a state where everyone can be kept ignorant, angry, and infinitely malleable.

These are all ideas today’s Republican party could easily stand for, if only the optics of smoldering cities and dead bodies didn't give people the wrong idea.

But this is exactly what they’ve been working toward for several decades. They’ve mercilessly hammered at the free press, and gotten only weak pushback for it. Which has let them build a propaganda platform with arguably 76 million Trump voters totally in thrall to a worldview that rewards lies and violence.

With the help of this platform, Putin wannabes are now flexing their muscles in virtually every red state. Greg Abbott in Texas. Ron DeSantis in Florida. Kristi Noem in South Dakota. Brian Kemp in Georgia. All the unbranded minor leaguers in Missouri, Tennessee, Alabama, Oklahoma, Idaho. We all have our favorites.  

These are the people intent on imposing a Putinesque worldview on their constituencies. They’re particularly big on bans at the moment. Bans on books they don’t like. Bans on ideas they don’t want taught. Bans on immigrants, abortions, contraception, gay marriage, and crucial medical treatments for trans kids who have enough on their plate without their states trying to kill them.

The point of it all seems to be cruelty. They can couch it in pseudo-religious dogma or free-market ideology, but it really comes down to cruelty for its own sake.

And they have a reasonable chance of getting their way.

As hard as that would be on this country, it would be a disaster for the countries of the Atlantic alliance, which is still the only viable counterweight to Putin’s aggression. Even as it’s been reinvigorated by the invasion of Ukraine, the alliance remains heavily dependent on American power and finance to underwrite its defense.

If Trump had won in 2020, there is little doubt he’d have pulled the U.S. out of NATO and reveled in the televised destruction of Ukraine. The possibility that Putin Lite Republicans could take over Congress in ‘22 or even the presidency in ‘24, has dire implications for the alliance, and, by extension, the future of the free world.

The social democracies of Europe were rattled by four years of Trump, and they remain deeply suspicious of a country that could elect such a monster. The return to power of criminally irresponsible people with Putin-like agendas would be, to them, a horrifying betrayal.

To be fair — which they themselves never are — not all of the GOP drinks Putin Lite. Some Republican officeholders — not all, but some — were brought up to love NATO and hate Russia.

They too were offended by Trump’s belligerent ignorance of foreign affairs. They hated his tariffs. They hated his trashing of NATO and his brown-nosing of Putin. They even hated his impeachable offenses in Ukraine. They just didn’t hate those things as much as they loved his tax cuts. So much for principles.

Meanwhile, the Trump wing of the party is fully on board with all those things, and more. Trump’s “America First” crowd would gleefully tear up all our treaties, seal off the country, and watch Europe burn from an ocean away. The more cruelty the better.

To these Republicans, the Putin Lite model works brilliantly, and is in full keeping with their own worldview. Putin has done us the service of shining a bright light on them, showing us exactly who they really are, what they really stand for, and what they’re really planning.

The thought of them returning to office is nauseating at best, deadly at worst.

 

 

Comments

  1. You are right. This could have been written today. I have difficulty deciding who is the worst person on earth, but when Putin speaks it makes the choice easier. But, then, Trump speaks and it gets hard to decide. Putin not going to the mini-summit because he is under threat of arrest is wonderful. It is perhaps time for a smash and grab and a trip to The Hague for the pile of crap.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

France and Britain Just Gave the Finger to Fascism

There is now ample evidence that people with democratic systems of government actually like them, and would just as soon keep them, flaws and all. There seems to be a strong backlash occurring in several European countries, a trend toward shoring up democracies threatened by toxic authoritarian forces. In Poland last year, then in France and Britain last week, actual voters — as opposed to deeply compromised opinion polls — gave a big middle finger to the fascists in their midst. I don’t pretend to understand the electoral systems of these countries — let alone their political currents — but I’m struck by the apparent connections between different elections in different countries, and what they might be saying to us. I’ve spoken before of Poland , where ten years of vicious minority rule was overturned at the ballot box. A ban on abortion was the galvanizing issue — sound familiar? — and it brought an overwhelming number of voters to the polls, many for the fir

Are America’s B.S. Detectors Finally Getting an Upgrade?

  Can a person acquire an immunity to propaganda? I’ve been wondering. It was Julia Ioffe who got me started. She wrote last week of the dwindling effectiveness of the Russian disinformation industry. She reports that the bot-farms that caused all the mischief in 2016 are now a shadow of their former selves. Ever since their founder and leader, Evgeny Prigozhin , was blown out of the sky last year, they’ve come under the control of Putin’s office, which means poor performance is now institutionalized. This can be seen in the messaging being disseminated by these so-called influence campaigns, which is almost comically inept. The content is focused exclusively on undermining support for Ukraine, a subject that couldn’t be less relevant to most Americans. Anyone who actually cares about Ukraine will just laugh at the fumbling English and feeble logic of the posts they’re seeing. But what really got me thinking was Ioffe’s assertion that these campaigns are old

Democrats, Step Away from the Ledge

  Anxiety comes easily to Democrats. We’re highly practiced at perceiving a crisis, wanting to fix it immediately, and being consistently frustrated when we can’t. Democrats understand consequences, which is why we always have plenty to worry about. Republicans don’t give a rat’s ass about consequences — which is, let’s face it, their superpower. I wasn’t intending to write about last Thursday’s debate, mostly because I post on Tuesdays, and this could be old news by the time it gets to you. But then the New York Times weighed in with a wildly disingenuous editorial calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race, and the rest of the mainstream media piled on. In the Times' not-so-humble opinion, Biden needs to consider “the good of the country,” something their own paper has repeatedly failed to do for almost a decade. And since this is now the crisis du jour for virtually every Democrat who watched that shitshow, I thought I might at l