Skip to main content

Dobbs is Just the Bludgeon We’ve Been Looking For

 

Still on vacation and aggressively not writing, I'm reprising a piece from last September — before the 2022 midterms — in which I pound on one of my favorite themes: the utter madness of the Dobbs decision.

Today of all days, this is particularly appropriate. Ohio voters are even now participating in a special election that was cynically thrown together by the extremely gerrymandered Republican legislature, on the assumption that nobody wants to vote in August. Based on early voting, this was a massive miscalculation.

The vote isn't officially about abortion, but rather about the ability of Ohio citizens to continue modifying their state constitution through petitions and referendums. But nobody has been fooled into thinking it's about anything but abortion.

 

I recently had occasion to engage in a brief political discussion with a bright and well-spoken woman in her mid-twenties. She was clearly perturbed at what she considered the failure of Democrats to push through the progressive agenda she and her generation have long been promised.

I felt her pain, knowing how hard the next twenty or thirty years will be for her age group, not just in this country, but planetwide. She will surely be a witness to spontaneous atrocities, environmental calamities, and a competition for dwindling resources that will reduce many of her fellow humans to savagery.

At the same time, I was embarrassed — as I often am — that I’m passing along to her a nation in far worse shape than it was when I found it.

Even so, I felt she was being a bit hard on the Democrats in power, most of whom have, more or less, behaved admirably in pursuing basically the same agenda as hers, even as they remain shackled to a constitutional system on the very cusp of failure.

I was tempted to cite for her all the ways that her agenda has been sabotaged by bad faith and worse gaslighting. I might’ve reminded her of how two undoubtedly corrupt Democratic senators blocked passage of crucial pieces of legislation. I could’ve pointed to the accomplishments of this administration, which have been, in spite of the obstacles, quite remarkable.

But instead I found myself keeping it simple. What I said to her was:

The only thing you need to know about Democrats is that they’re not Republicans.

At the time, it sounded glib, even to me. But thinking about it since, I realized this is exactly what Democratic messaging needs to be going forward. Not just for this cycle, but for 2024 as well.

Because regardless of the office being contested, there is now only one issue on the ballot: the Republican threat to democracy.

Your vote couldn’t be more binary: Are you for democracy or against it? Are you voting Democrat or not? You can't hide behind ‘undecided’ or ‘independent,’  two synonyms for ‘not paying attention.’

There is no longer any point in talking issues, policies, or ideas with Republicans. They are not interested, and they refuse to acknowledge anyone who might be. There’s no way to engage them in the real world. All we can do is vote them away.

Local races will surely have local realities that local candidates will need to address. But there is no race so local that Democrats can’t exploit their biggest opportunity — the sheer stupidity and wanton cruelty of the Dobbs decision.

The Supreme Court has bestowed upon us a huge gift, a self-inflicted wound we can now weaponize. I’ve been writing for some time that killingRoe would be a disaster for the GOP, and I’m cautiously considering that I might be right.

Dobbs just might be the worst political blunder of the last century. It’s the perfect encapsulation of everything Republicans stand for. It defines them in ways anyone — at any age or education level — can understand. It brings the threat to democracy to everyone’s doorstep, especially women’s. And it frames the threat as a simple thumbs-up or thumbs-down.

In other words, they’ve given us a bludgeon, and we must pummel them with it. We have to force them to defend their so-called “pro life” position, and not allow them to sidestep it. Even they know how stupid the whole issue makes them look, which is why they’re furiously scrubbing any mention of abortion from their websites.

I’m by no means the only one who sees this. Rachel Bitecofer — the “election whisperer,” whose unconventional wisdom is both rigorously data-driven and strikingly insightful — preaches it to anyone who’ll listen.

I haven’t cited Bitecofer since the 2020 election, mostly because she’s been Debbie Downer about this year’s prospects. She had, until recently, been fully expecting Democrats to lose both the House and the Senate, and she herself was preparing for a rapid plunge into institutional fascism.

So now, when she says the tide is turning, I listen. And when she insists that this election is about Dobbs, Dobbs, and more Dobbs, I get the message.

Here’s what she said on the BobCesca Show — an excellent podcast — last week:

We could do everything the same and we’d still get whacked in November, if it wasn’t for the assist of having the Supreme Court strip away women’s fundamental liberty. 

So if you hear my voice, and you’re in charge of messaging or strategy, there is not a part of the voter file that is not reacting to this change of abortion politics … We should be hammering them, and make sure people are terrified of voting for Republicans.

Democrats have always been reluctant to resort to mud-slinging. But Republicans are now gifting them with so much mud, it would be unethical not to sling it.

So I’ve taken the liberty of suggesting a few ways a Democratic candidate for any office, anywhere in the U.S. — whether running in a red or a blue area — can sling along.

Stop saying:

I’m firmly pro-choice.

Start saying:

My opponent wants your daughter to give birth to her rapist’s baby.

My opponent thinks a fetus should have more rights than its mother.

My opponent doesn't care if your wife dies in childbirth, as long as her doctor doesn't try to save her.

Republicans think the doctor who saves your wife's life should go to prison for it.

Republicans think your sex life is their business.

Republicans want to inspect your child’s sex organs.

Better yet, say all of these things, and mix in a few “local” variations for good measure. Name names wherever possible.

Democrats need to be less kind and less gentle. They need to call out the lies, the grifting, the gaslighting, the mindless bullying, the cruel posturing.

While this all seems glaringly obvious to most of us, the attitude of my young friend was slightly disquieting. It’s not that I expect that she’ll vote Republican this year, or ever. But I do expect that she’ll vote. Others in her cohort, I’m not so sure.

Statistically, her generation — those with arguably the most at stake in the fate of this country — is prone to turning disappointment with Democrats into an excuse not to vote.

Hopefully, as Dobbs sinks in, this will change. Hopefully, Dobbs will give her peer group a sense of the danger that’s ahead, and how hard it will be to avert. Hopefully, the loss of basic rights will convince them that this is an emergency.

They need to know that their apathy could quite literally kill them. They need to vote like their lives depend on it.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

France and Britain Just Gave the Finger to Fascism

There is now ample evidence that people with democratic systems of government actually like them, and would just as soon keep them, flaws and all. There seems to be a strong backlash occurring in several European countries, a trend toward shoring up democracies threatened by toxic authoritarian forces. In Poland last year, then in France and Britain last week, actual voters — as opposed to deeply compromised opinion polls — gave a big middle finger to the fascists in their midst. I don’t pretend to understand the electoral systems of these countries — let alone their political currents — but I’m struck by the apparent connections between different elections in different countries, and what they might be saying to us. I’ve spoken before of Poland , where ten years of vicious minority rule was overturned at the ballot box. A ban on abortion was the galvanizing issue — sound familiar? — and it brought an overwhelming number of voters to the polls, many for the fir

Are America’s B.S. Detectors Finally Getting an Upgrade?

  Can a person acquire an immunity to propaganda? I’ve been wondering. It was Julia Ioffe who got me started. She wrote last week of the dwindling effectiveness of the Russian disinformation industry. She reports that the bot-farms that caused all the mischief in 2016 are now a shadow of their former selves. Ever since their founder and leader, Evgeny Prigozhin , was blown out of the sky last year, they’ve come under the control of Putin’s office, which means poor performance is now institutionalized. This can be seen in the messaging being disseminated by these so-called influence campaigns, which is almost comically inept. The content is focused exclusively on undermining support for Ukraine, a subject that couldn’t be less relevant to most Americans. Anyone who actually cares about Ukraine will just laugh at the fumbling English and feeble logic of the posts they’re seeing. But what really got me thinking was Ioffe’s assertion that these campaigns are old

Democrats, Step Away from the Ledge

  Anxiety comes easily to Democrats. We’re highly practiced at perceiving a crisis, wanting to fix it immediately, and being consistently frustrated when we can’t. Democrats understand consequences, which is why we always have plenty to worry about. Republicans don’t give a rat’s ass about consequences — which is, let’s face it, their superpower. I wasn’t intending to write about last Thursday’s debate, mostly because I post on Tuesdays, and this could be old news by the time it gets to you. But then the New York Times weighed in with a wildly disingenuous editorial calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race, and the rest of the mainstream media piled on. In the Times' not-so-humble opinion, Biden needs to consider “the good of the country,” something their own paper has repeatedly failed to do for almost a decade. And since this is now the crisis du jour for virtually every Democrat who watched that shitshow, I thought I might at l