Skip to main content

The Benighted States of America

It's hard to escape the feeling that the country is coming apart at the seams, and that the seams are literally the borders between the states.

It used to be, when we talked of red states and blue states, we were basically talking about electorates, and how they voted. Now we're talking about deep cultural divides that are, on the red side, wholly artificial — they're being imposed from above, with little or no popular support. Republicans with veto-proof majorities in their state legislatures are writing harsh new rules for living in their states, more-or-less inviting anyone who's not happy about it to leave.  

At this point, one can't even call it sabotage — these legislators are no longer operating in secret. They're openly dismantling the laws and institutions of their states, with very little idea — let alone care — about what to do once everything is dismantled. They have no interest in the well-being of their constituents, only in the venality of their wealthy friends and the ability to punch down the social ladder with impunity.

If you're a sentient human living within the borders of a state being run by these bent legislators, you're looking at a future of escalating cognitive dissonance.

Your benighted state is now directly in your face, which is not where a state should be. It now determines how you plan and raise a family, how you educate your children, how you access rational healthcare, and how you manage to coexist with armed and dangerous neighbors.

If you're a physician or an educator, your state controls whether you can practice your profession in the ways you were trained, or whether the threat of vengeful lawsuits will cloud your decision-making.

If you're female, or Black, or Latina, or an immigrant — or anything but white, straight, and Christo-fascist — your state wants to push you out to society's margins. It wants to de-humanize you, criminalize you, and encourage you — one way or another — to die.

What's already bad is sure to get worse. In front of our eyes, red-state Republicans are in the process of turning their states into white supremacy fiefdoms. They're imposing feudal rules based on pseudo-religious principles that only they understand. They're fiddling with their legal systems to neutralize voters. They're stocking their courts with accommodating judges. They're putting assault weapons in the hands of assault-minded people. They're no doubt ramping up their privatized prison systems, eagerly anticipating the pipeline of free labor they'll enjoy from those who fall through the cracks in the system. Cracks that will only get wider.

While the culpability of Fox in these developments cannot be overstated, these legislators are, oddly, post-Fox. While they have Fox to thank for the thorough, thirty-year brainwashing of their electorates — which made it oh so easy for them to get elected and stay that way — they seem to have left Fox behind. Their corrupt agendas are rolling out, practically in real time, which is too fast for Fox to keep up with, and too radical for even Fox to be comfortable with.

The people Fox has helped elect in recent years— the creatures for whom it provided endless airtime and shameless cheerleading — have no business in mixed company, let alone running a state. Yet Fox helped them rig the system to the point where they are not removable. They can engage in any form of suppression, subjugate any segment of their populations, and target any institution they can label 'woke' — including the media, including maybe even Fox.

Meanwhile, litigation is the new national pastime. Everyone is lawyering up. Endless time, effort, and expense are going into lawsuits that test the limits of backward laws, and into lawyers who are doing the testing.

This applies, not just to red states, but also to the blue states that are forced to write their own laws in reaction, almost in self-defense. Which is why we see blue states, like Washington and Illinois, not just codifying their reproductive rights, but also openly offering safe haven to people from neighboring states, people who can't get buffoon-free healthcare where they live.

As a result, we'll soon be seeing a rash of state-on-state lawsuits — red states suing blue-state healthcare systems, blue states counter-suing to protect them. The basic rights of a person from a red state are already substantially different from those of the blue state they seek help from. It will take years of litigation to sort this all out.

And the effects of all this litigation go beyond the specifics of the lawsuits. They create a state of mind — a sort of "sue or be sued" mentality — that hurts everyone.

Consider reports that none other than Planned Parenthood is suffering from a growing organizational phobia — call it fear of litigation. In the fraught legal environment surrounding the conflicting abortion laws from state to state, Planned Parenthood has been listening to its lawyers, who see a bottomless pit of interstate lawsuits in its future. This has made the whole organization risk-averse, and distressingly timid about testing the legal waters around abortion practices from one state to another.

Of course, you can see their point. What good is an organization like Planned Parenthood if it can be sued out of existence? Which is what can happen when a litigation free-for-all is triggered by an avalanche of nonsensical but inhumane laws.

As usual, it's Texas leading the way, with its medieval anti-abortion, anti-trans, anti-LGBTQ, anti-Black, anti-woman, anti-book, anti-voter, but staunchly pro-gun legislation.  

And Texas has created the template for the other benighted states to follow. Just in the last few weeks, Idaho, Utah, Arkansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, North Carolina, South Carolina, and, of course, Florida have served up a raft of heinous laws in the same vein. Some have even loosened child labor laws, something virtually unheard of in a working democracy.

Taken in aggregate, these laws seek to remake society in ways that only the most repulsive people would want. Over the long haul, the legislatures that remain red will divert state resources, away from healthcare, education, infrastructure, or anything useful, and towards the legal processing of criminals who shouldn't be criminals, through laws that shouldn't be laws.

Taken to its logical conclusion, these fiefdoms won't be able to afford to let their own serfs leave their own states. They'll need to keep them ignorant and docile, which won't happen if the serfs are allowed to just sashay across state lines at will. They might notice how people in reality-based communities live.

And in the benighted states of America, that is not part of the plan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

France and Britain Just Gave the Finger to Fascism

There is now ample evidence that people with democratic systems of government actually like them, and would just as soon keep them, flaws and all. There seems to be a strong backlash occurring in several European countries, a trend toward shoring up democracies threatened by toxic authoritarian forces. In Poland last year, then in France and Britain last week, actual voters — as opposed to deeply compromised opinion polls — gave a big middle finger to the fascists in their midst. I don’t pretend to understand the electoral systems of these countries — let alone their political currents — but I’m struck by the apparent connections between different elections in different countries, and what they might be saying to us. I’ve spoken before of Poland , where ten years of vicious minority rule was overturned at the ballot box. A ban on abortion was the galvanizing issue — sound familiar? — and it brought an overwhelming number of voters to the polls, many for the fir

Don’t Let the New York Times Do Your Thinking

  My father would not live any place where the New York Times couldn’t be delivered before 7:00 a.m. To him, the Times was “the newspaper of record,” the keeper of the first drafts of history. It had the reach and the resources to be anywhere history was being made, and the skills to report it accurately. He trusted it more than any other news source, including Walter Cronkite. Like my dad, I grew to associate the Times with serious journalism, the first place one goes for the straight story. Their news was always assumed to be objectively presented, with the facts front-and-center. Their op-ed writers were well-reasoned and erudite, even when I thought they were full of shit. But there was more. The Times became — for me, at least — a sort of guide to critical thinking. It helped teach me, at an impressionable age, to weigh the facts before forming an opinion. And many of my opinions — including deeply-held ones — were formed around facts I might have read

Democrats, Step Away from the Ledge

  Anxiety comes easily to Democrats. We’re highly practiced at perceiving a crisis, wanting to fix it immediately, and being consistently frustrated when we can’t. Democrats understand consequences, which is why we always have plenty to worry about. Republicans don’t give a rat’s ass about consequences — which is, let’s face it, their superpower. I wasn’t intending to write about last Thursday’s debate, mostly because I post on Tuesdays, and this could be old news by the time it gets to you. But then the New York Times weighed in with a wildly disingenuous editorial calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race, and the rest of the mainstream media piled on. In the Times' not-so-humble opinion, Biden needs to consider “the good of the country,” something their own paper has repeatedly failed to do for almost a decade. And since this is now the crisis du jour for virtually every Democrat who watched that shitshow, I thought I might at l