Skip to main content

Who’s Afraid of Drag Queen Story Hour?

Today’s Republican party comes with an ambitious agenda.

In no particular order, it seeks to ban books, ban abortion, ban discussions of race, rewrite history, corrupt elections, mandate guns, whitewash school curricula, gut the social safety net, trade the rule of law for theocracy, and marginalize, wherever possible, Black people, women, immigrants, Jews, Muslims, and anyone who’s not white, straight, Christian, and cruel. This is not a comprehensive list.

And yet, with so much on their plate — with so much havoc still to be wreaked, so many barbarous laws to be written, so many marginalized groups to torment — they can still find time to demonize drag queens.

That’s right. Forget the dying planet, the killer weather, the crumbling infrastructure. Drag queens are the real problem.

There are currently bills moving through the legislatures of fourteen states that would, in one way or another, criminalize drag performance.

On the surface, they’re aimed at raising the risks — both legal and physical — of performing in drag. Beneath the surface, but not far beneath, they’re all about punishment for existing while queer.

Some of these laws would restrict drag performances to areas zoned for “adult” businesses, which is to say they’d be lumped together with “gentlemen’s clubs” and porn shops. Bars, restaurants, campuses, bookstores, theaters, pride events would all become, by law, drag-free. Were bar and restaurant owners asked about this?

The Tennessee legislature is leading the charge backwards, having just passed a broadly worded, mean-spirited bill that seeks to make criminal any “adult cabaret” performance on public property. By ‘public property,’ they mean streets — particularly during pride parades — but also schools and, especially, public libraries.

Which is very much to the point. Because one of the many malignant drivers of this inanity is the astro-turfed backlash from the huge nationwide success of Drag Queen Story Hour, the best thing that has happened to local libraries in at least a generation.

What seems to be upsetting these legislators — or what Tucker Carlson has told them should upset them — is the use of civic facilities for the supposed sexualization of children. That these are men just pretending to be women so they can gain the trust of little Bobby. That what they’re really doing is grooming little Bobby for future sale into sex slavery. How do you tell people who believe these things that they’re not true?

Sadly, this is just one more tedious variation on the same pedophilia scam they’ve been running for years. They endlessly flog the trope of gay men as hyper-sexualized predators with a special preference for children. And they amplify that trope in the fact-free vacuum of the right-wing media bubble. Nobody in that bubble will ever hear otherwise.

So I’m here to state categorically — if you don’t already know — that you couldn’t possibly find a less sexually charged pastime than Drag Queen Story Hour.

YouTube is rife with videos, mostly shot in libraries, mostly packed with little kids, wide-eyed, watching drag queens hamming it up, vamping their way through children’s books, and generally working the crowd — kids and parents alike. A hoot for all.

Let’s stipulate that drag queens are innately entertaining. They come in bright colors and vivid personalities, which kids lap up. People of all ages are drawn to their flamboyance. And once you see how a well-decked-out queen can mesmerize an underage audience, the mere thought that this could be even slightly controversial takes your breath away.

Yet somehow, reading to children while in drag has become, for people not of  this century, “sexually explicit content,” something from which their children must be ruthlessly protected.

Nina West is something of a star in the drag world. She competed on RuPaul’s Drag Race, which has long been a touchstone for drag culture. She has also been touring as Edna, the breakthrough drag role in the musical Hairspray.

But it’s Drag Queen Story Hour that clearly consumes her. To her, the stories help fill a pressing need for entertainment that’s kid-friendly and family-oriented, but specifically tailored to queer communities with children to raise:

“There are members of our community who want to be married, who want to have children, and who are raising families in a world with very few family-friendly queer role models. There are people who want to expose their children to the kind of entertainment and the kind of culture that they wish to celebrate, that's distinctly queer. And what's more distinctly queer than drag?”

The benefits, of course, are hardly limited to queer families. Any activity that normalizes the interaction of new and different family permutations, as they evolve, is surely an unqualified good.

Needless to say, this doesn’t sit well with a wide range of nutjobs, some prone to vigilantism.

Nina writes of death threats from internet trolls, of car horns blared through the night, of signs on her lawn reading “a pedophile lives here,” and of the disclosure of her legal name on social media. When the Hairspray tour ends, she’s afraid to go home.

But she insists that her own woes are nothing compared to the dead and wounded at the Club Q drag show in Colorado. Or the Proud Boys shutting down a drag show in Ohio through armed intimidation.

Or, I could add, the sabotage of an electrical grid in North Carolina, which triggered a widespread blackout just as a local Drag Queen Story Hour was scheduled to start. This has never felt like coincidence.

We can see this war on drag as a subset of a much broader war, a war on art itself. It’s one of fascism’s greatest hits. Look up “degenerate art” under Hitler, or “socialist realism” under Stalin, and you’ll get the idea. Autocrats always need to go after the artists, not just because artists speak truth, but because they’re seen as soft targets, easily bullied.

Drag is, by any definition, art. At its highest level it can hold its own with any form of performance. Eddy Izzard, Harvey Fierstein, Justin Vivian Bond (Kiki, of Kiki & Herb), and John Cameron Mitchell (“Hedwig and the Angry Inch”) are cross-over cultural icons. And that’s just from my generation.

That Republican lawmakers are conflating real art with salacious fiction — with lurid fantasies of flashing genitals and pantomimed sex acts — just shows us where the real obscenity lies.

Or, as one mercifully sane Tennessee legislator, speaking against the anti-drag bill, put it rather tartly:

“Drag is not about exposing private body parts or performing sexual content by nature,” she said. “Let me tell you, with the number of layers most drag queens are wearing, trying to expose a private part is not even really feasible.”

Drag culture — and LGBTQ culture, in general — will not be stopped. They are already part of the mainstream, and their influence on subsequent generations will only grow. To drive those cultures underground — which is what these laws hope to accomplish — is a solution in search of a problem.

All it does is make criminals out of people who are anything but.

Comments

  1. Thanks Andy. Is there anything worse than Republicans? I don't think so. I am so tired of their forever and ongoing hatred of everything. I would like to be able to understand their ignorance and "persecution". But just have to say, they have unfortunately made me dislike, even hate them in a way I never thought I possible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fundamentalists' pent up sexual frustration is legendary. Misdirected attention on "deviants" is just a response to the debauchery going on in their own heads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Funny brother, I was going to write the same thing as I read this. If one could read minds or be a fly on those walls....Hypocrisy reigns!

      Delete
    2. Yeah, it's a war on sex too. I didn't get around to that part of it.

      Delete
  3. It is important to realize that you are correct in saying that the GOP creeps actually HATE everything that is not them. Fortunately or unfortunately history seems to move in cycles. The Hitler era ended and so will this era. But the attitudes will rise again someday. Right now the GOP creeps make me sick to my stomach. I wish I knew what to do about it. Tums won't help.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Frank when can we get together to discuss suing Fox "News" for actively working to destroy our democracy. We are all a party to their lies and defamation of our government and way of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Suing Fox will only make it worse. Any time you threaten the cult leader, the followers will just get more entrenched.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Six Things Every American Needs to Know About Trump

  When it comes to Trump, piling on is a civic duty. We cannot afford to allow him even the slightest chance of retaking power. He needs to be overwhelmed. Simon Rosenberg — the veteran political analyst who famously predicted that the Red Wave of 2020 would be the Republican debacle it turned out to be — is urging a practical, grassroots approach to the problem. He is openly optimistic about the Democrats’ prospects this year, but he wants us all to be smart about it. He's especially concerned about getting information to the depressing percentage of the public who have no real grasp of who Trump really is, let alone the clear and present danger he represents. Right now, they are not paying attention, but Rosenberg wants us to be ready when they are, and to have at our command “ The Six Things Americans Are Going To Learn About Trump They Didn’t Know in 2020.” There’s nothing new here, but seeing it in one place is valuable. Think of it as a starter set o

The New York Times has Gone Over to the Dark Side

  A week or so ago, Trump took a break from the courtroom and held a rally in a picturesque corner of New Jersey, a state he has no hope of winning. His speech at this rally was even more unhinged than usual, featuring his now-famous tributes to Al Capone and Hannibal Lecter — the latter being as fictional as Trump’s medical records, but seemingly real in his mind. These speeches are growing worse over time, and they seem to betray a worsening cognitive condition. Unfortunately, the New York Times doesn’t see it that way. Their reporting of the event was basically a puff piece . To them, this rally was Trump’s well-deserved break from the rigors and indignities of his criminal trial. They marvel that, “after a long and tense week,” he could now head to the Jersey Shore for some much-needed rest and adulation: Against the backdrop of classic Americana, Mr. Trump repeated his typical criticism that Mr. Biden’s economic policies were hurting the middle class.

The Origin Story of the Pro-Death Movement

  Two weeks ago, I excoriated the New York Times for its heavy hand in election coverage, for compulsively favoring the horserace over the survival of the American Experiment. Of course, no sooner had I done that then they published the sort of eye-opening exposé that few journalistic organizations have the resources to pull off anymore. Which only served to underscore what we’ve been missing from the Times in this year of hair-raising silliness. It was a long and depressing article about the behind-the-scenes machinations that led to the fall of Roe v. Wade . It tells of a loose but vast movement of religious zealots, reactionary lawyers, and red-state legislators who saw the election of Donald Trump as the moment they’d been waiting for. Think of them as the pro-death movement: [T]hey had built an elite legal and ideological ecosystem of activists, organizations, lawmakers and pro bono lawyers around their cause. Their policy arms churned out legal argument