Skip to main content

They’re Using ‘Trump’ and ‘Espionage’ in the Same Sentence

It isn’t every day that a former president gets investigated for espionage. One more first for Donald Trump.

Yes, we’ve all been titillated by every sordid new development in the ongoing saga of the Mar-a-Lago files. But the big question, at least for me, remains: What was he thinking? Why would he take state secrets out of the White House, knowing full well it’s a felony?

Not that he’s a stranger to felonies, but still.

The press has focused mainly on the make-believe theories thrown up by the wingnut right to explain away the obvious. But I’ve not seen much on the espionage angle itself.

Which is strange. Because the very word ‘espionage’ puts an unmistakably sinister spin on Trump’s motives. It’s not a word that either CIA or DOJ throws around a lot. But it’s a word both are using.

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about Trump it’s that life is about transactions, about trading favors. He is, by nature, a quid in search of the perfect pro quo. So while we don’t know how sensitive these documents actually are, we can be quite sure they’re for sale.

It seems likely that they’ve long since been gone through, evaluated for market value, and digitally scanned. They could now be in the cloud, or on a hard drive, or on a dozen thumb drives. They could be sold outright, or used for blackmail.

There is plenty of speculation that snakes like, say, Jared Kushner, Stephen Miller, or Kash Patel could have cherry-picked the documents and converted them to digital files.

In which case people like, say, Mohammed bin Salman, Kim Jong-Un, or Vladimir Putin could, right now, be looking at a thumb drive containing America’s deepest secrets.

Keep in mind, heads are still scratching over bin Salman’s commitment of $2 billion to Jared’s new investment fund. Yes, this is pocket change for MBS, but it still feels rash given Jared’s stellar record of business failure. Until you realize how very interested the Saudis are in nuclear technology.

For all we know, Trump and his flunkies — Mike Flynn? Rand Paul? Ron Johnson? Rudy Giuliani? — could all be hawking American nuclear secrets to every dictator and jihadist on the planet.

Surely Russia would pay well to know the names of the moles burrowed deep in the Kremlin, especially the ones who tipped off Biden that Putin was about to invade Ukraine.

Wouldn’t Iran lust for inside knowledge of Israeli-American military technology? Wouldn’t China love to see America’s plans for defending Taiwan? Wouldn’t North Korea cherish any nuclear information at all? Come to think of it, what country — friend or foe, legitimate or rogue — wouldn’t want American secrets?

Then there’s Michael Cohen’s theory, that Trump will use the documents to blackmail the U.S. government itself. That he’ll threaten to release military secrets if DOJ doesn’t call off its investigations. That he’ll try to make a deal for non-prosecution of all crimes, past and present.

It would be, for Trump, the transaction of a lifetime. I doubt he can pull it off, but I don’t doubt he’d try it.

Then again, he could flee the country on a private jet, one step ahead of the sheriff. He could use the thumb drive as his ticket to a cushy new career in Moscow, complete with his own TV channel. He and Putin can bring their love affair out into the open, and Trump can act as president-in-exile, manipulating his idiot base from Russia, plotting his triumphant return to an America finally made great, thanks to him.

You don’t need an especially dirty mind to see the plausibility of any of these scenarios. We would not put any of them past him.

But what’s largely being overlooked, or at least under-examined, is the harm that has already been done with these files.

Because even if that thumb drive doesn’t exist, the intelligence community absolutely must assume that it does. Too much time has passed between the theft and its discovery to assume otherwise.

All of NATO — as well as every intelligence service in the West — is right now scrambling to see which of their assets might have been compromised.

We keep hearing how these files could ‘jeopardize national security,’ but the phrase feels euphemistic. Like they're trying not to call it a catastrophe.

CIA has sent a letter to Congress, announcing a “damage assessment” of the Mar-a-Lago cache. The word ‘damage’ says it all. They’re not calling it a risk assessment or a breach assessment. They’re acknowledging that there’s conclusive evidence of harm done. And they’re using the word ‘espionage.’

Clearly they have their hands full. They have to investigate who might, or might not, have a copy of a thumb drive that might, or might not, exist. They have to figure out what might be on it. They have to find out whose cover might be blown by it. And they have to identify which secrets can no longer be considered secret.

Depending on what they find, the implications could be dark indeed.

Already, agent networks that took decades to build could be gone. Already, NATO-aligned spies, all over the world, could be disappearing off the streets. Some could be tortured. Some could be killed outright.

Last week, the chairman of Russia’s largest oil company somehow fell out the window of his hospital room and died. He was exactly the kind of guy we’d want inside the Russian energy establishment, working for us. And ‘falling’ from high places is a very Russian way to die.

It gets worse. These documents could give away all sorts of spy technologies, weapons systems, military strategies, and dirt on NATO politicians. Not to mention nuclear secrets. We’ll never know.

Okay, I could be jumping to conclusions. Maybe the Mar-a-Lago files aren’t that important. Maybe the whole espionage thing is overblown.

But the idea that Trump could be working side hustles with foreign dictators is hardly new. We’ve suspected it for years, and the circumstantial evidence keeps pouring in. Plus, we know it’s totally in character for him.

But whether he is or isn’t a foreign agent, his intentions have clearly not been honorable.

Which is why governments all over the world are surely jumping to the same conclusions I am. And why we wouldn’t be talking about damage assessment if there weren’t real damage to assess.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

France and Britain Just Gave the Finger to Fascism

There is now ample evidence that people with democratic systems of government actually like them, and would just as soon keep them, flaws and all. There seems to be a strong backlash occurring in several European countries, a trend toward shoring up democracies threatened by toxic authoritarian forces. In Poland last year, then in France and Britain last week, actual voters — as opposed to deeply compromised opinion polls — gave a big middle finger to the fascists in their midst. I don’t pretend to understand the electoral systems of these countries — let alone their political currents — but I’m struck by the apparent connections between different elections in different countries, and what they might be saying to us. I’ve spoken before of Poland , where ten years of vicious minority rule was overturned at the ballot box. A ban on abortion was the galvanizing issue — sound familiar? — and it brought an overwhelming number of voters to the polls, many for the fir

Are America’s B.S. Detectors Finally Getting an Upgrade?

  Can a person acquire an immunity to propaganda? I’ve been wondering. It was Julia Ioffe who got me started. She wrote last week of the dwindling effectiveness of the Russian disinformation industry. She reports that the bot-farms that caused all the mischief in 2016 are now a shadow of their former selves. Ever since their founder and leader, Evgeny Prigozhin , was blown out of the sky last year, they’ve come under the control of Putin’s office, which means poor performance is now institutionalized. This can be seen in the messaging being disseminated by these so-called influence campaigns, which is almost comically inept. The content is focused exclusively on undermining support for Ukraine, a subject that couldn’t be less relevant to most Americans. Anyone who actually cares about Ukraine will just laugh at the fumbling English and feeble logic of the posts they’re seeing. But what really got me thinking was Ioffe’s assertion that these campaigns are old

Democrats, Step Away from the Ledge

  Anxiety comes easily to Democrats. We’re highly practiced at perceiving a crisis, wanting to fix it immediately, and being consistently frustrated when we can’t. Democrats understand consequences, which is why we always have plenty to worry about. Republicans don’t give a rat’s ass about consequences — which is, let’s face it, their superpower. I wasn’t intending to write about last Thursday’s debate, mostly because I post on Tuesdays, and this could be old news by the time it gets to you. But then the New York Times weighed in with a wildly disingenuous editorial calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race, and the rest of the mainstream media piled on. In the Times' not-so-humble opinion, Biden needs to consider “the good of the country,” something their own paper has repeatedly failed to do for almost a decade. And since this is now the crisis du jour for virtually every Democrat who watched that shitshow, I thought I might at l