Skip to main content

Putin Lite: Republicans Ramp Up the Cruelty

If there is but one lone favor Vladimir Putin is doing for the world, it’s that he’s setting an excellent bad example.

He is now the poster boy for the very worst humankind has to offer. No matter who or where you are, Putin presents you with a bright moral line, separating two crystal clear worldviews. Democracy or Autocracy.

There are no shades of gray here. You can no longer look at Putin and not know which side of the line you’re on.

Which is why it says a lot that so many Republicans can’t seem to decide.

While they might secretly cheer the wanton slaughter of entire cities, they also understand that endorsing so much carnage and death might be politically awkward, even for them.

The same conundrum is forcing them to defend democracy, which they’ve otherwise abandoned as not compatible with their ambitions, let alone those of their donors. And since the whole idea of democracy is now inextricably linked to Ukraine and the atrocities being endured there, Republicans are reluctantly sitting on their hands, afraid to say what they really think.

But make no mistake, they are smitten with the Putin model. Think of them as Putin Lite.

They love the idea of total control, of the power of life and death over other people. They dream of a world where cruelty and ruthlessness are state assets. Where there’s a brisk market for torturers and con artists. Where prisons are kept constantly filled with Blacks, immigrants, and Democrats.

They share the same basic values as Putin and, of course, Trump — male dominance, white supremacy, grand larceny — and they see Putin as the apotheosis of those values.

But more than that, Putin’s actions are showing them what’s possible. Not so much by what he’s doing to Ukraine, as what he’s doing to his own people.

They look on in envy at a Russian populace enthusiastically complicit in its own impoverishment, one that applauds its own exploitation and can be reprogrammed to applaud anything else at the flip of a switch.

They look longingly on a propaganda machine that allows no truth or factual content to intrude on any chosen narrative. They marvel at the swift and brutal retribution leveled at any form of dissent. They pray for a real police state they can call their own, a state where everyone can be kept ignorant, angry, and infinitely malleable.

These are all ideas today’s Republican party could easily stand for, if only the optics of smoldering cities and dead bodies didn't give people the wrong idea.

But this is exactly what they’ve been working toward for several decades. They’ve mercilessly hammered at the free press, and gotten only weak pushback for it. Which has let them build a propaganda platform with arguably 76 million Trump voters totally in thrall to a worldview that rewards lies and violence.

With the help of this platform, Putin wannabes are now flexing their muscles in virtually every red state. Greg Abbott in Texas. Ron DeSantis in Florida. Kristi Noem in South Dakota. Brian Kemp in Georgia. All the unbranded minor leaguers in Missouri, Tennessee, Alabama, Oklahoma, Idaho. We all have our favorites.  

These are the people intent on imposing a Putinesque worldview on their constituencies. They’re particularly big on bans at the moment. Bans on books they don’t like. Bans on ideas they don’t want taught. Bans on immigrants, abortions, contraception, gay marriage, and crucial medical treatments for trans kids who have enough on their plate without their states trying to kill them.

The point of it all seems to be cruelty. They can couch it in pseudo-religious dogma or free-market ideology, but it really comes down to cruelty for its own sake.

And they have a reasonable chance of getting their way.

As hard as that would be on this country, it would be a disaster for the countries of the Atlantic alliance, which is still the only viable counterweight to Putin’s aggression. Even as it’s been reinvigorated by the invasion of Ukraine, the alliance remains heavily dependent on American power and finance to underwrite its defense.

If Trump had won in 2020, there is little doubt he’d have pulled the U.S. out of NATO and reveled in the televised destruction of Ukraine. The possibility that Putin Lite Republicans could take over Congress in ‘22 or even the presidency in ‘24, has dire implications for the alliance, and, by extension, the future of the free world.

The social democracies of Europe were rattled by four years of Trump, and they remain deeply suspicious of a country that could elect such a monster. The return to power of criminally irresponsible people with Putin-like agendas would be, to them, a horrifying betrayal.

To be fair — which they themselves never are — not all of the GOP drinks Putin Lite. Some Republican officeholders — not all, but some — were brought up to love NATO and hate Russia.

They too were offended by Trump’s belligerent ignorance of foreign affairs. They hated his tariffs. They hated his trashing of NATO and his brown-nosing of Putin. They even hated his impeachable offenses in Ukraine. They just didn’t hate those things as much as they loved his tax cuts. So much for principles.

Meanwhile, the Trump wing of the party is fully on board with all those things, and more. Trump’s “America First” crowd would gleefully tear up all our treaties, seal off the country, and watch Europe burn from an ocean away. The more cruelty the better.

To these Republicans, the Putin Lite model works brilliantly, and is in full keeping with their own worldview. Putin has done us the service of shining a bright light on them, showing us exactly who they really are, what they really stand for, and what they’re really planning.

The thought of them returning to office is nauseating at best, deadly at worst.

 

Comments

  1. A BBC commentator last week stated that he thinks Putin is actually waging war on us by creating the inflation that is screwing everybody except the horridly rich GOP creeps that support the party and who hate the rest of us and want us dead or at least rendered meaningless. But, here is my question: what do they do if they achieve this goal? How will they amuse themselves after they have achieved domination? Without hate they are nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Show trials. Torture. Gulags. Public executions. Gladiator tournaments. The amusements are endless when you think about it.

      Delete
  2. I have felt all along that Putin decided to invade Ukraine in part to destabilize Biden's presidency and the fragile Democrat dominated government. He is a brilliant psychopath. He could see that his war would have the effects on our country that they are in fact having. People say we've been here before...I say this is a whole new thing with some repetitive themes. The difference is, there are many more of us here now and the planet is in peril like never before and Putin's war is helping to enhance power where it doesn't belong. I have sadly lost hope that humans will evolve in time to save ourselves.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The GOP's Weaknesses are More Apparent than its Strengths

  Anyone who’s paying attention now understands that this election is a whole lot scarier than it ever should have been. It’s a shame — and an indictment of our constitutional system — that it comes down to an election at all. Surely, the Trump problem should have been settled by now, with no further elections required to get him out of our lives. His crimes were such that the real crime was letting him remain at large. All those checks and balances we were taught to revere should have somehow found a way to rid us of this monster. But the Supreme Court seems to have Trump’s back, though it’s not clear what that gains them. If anything, it makes one wonder what Trump is holding over them, and what might happen to their families if they don’t keep him out of prison. So it will come down to the election, and the lines couldn’t be drawn more indelibly. I prefer to think this can work out well — that these scorched-earth hacks can be overwhelmed at the ballot box

The New York Times has Gone Over to the Dark Side

  A week or so ago, Trump took a break from the courtroom and held a rally in a picturesque corner of New Jersey, a state he has no hope of winning. His speech at this rally was even more unhinged than usual, featuring his now-famous tributes to Al Capone and Hannibal Lecter — the latter being as fictional as Trump’s medical records, but seemingly real in his mind. These speeches are growing worse over time, and they seem to betray a worsening cognitive condition. Unfortunately, the New York Times doesn’t see it that way. Their reporting of the event was basically a puff piece . To them, this rally was Trump’s well-deserved break from the rigors and indignities of his criminal trial. They marvel that, “after a long and tense week,” he could now head to the Jersey Shore for some much-needed rest and adulation: Against the backdrop of classic Americana, Mr. Trump repeated his typical criticism that Mr. Biden’s economic policies were hurting the middle class.

Trump and Pecker Sittin’ in a Tree

  Before there was Fox News, before there was Rush Limbaugh, before there was the sprawling rightwing ecosystem of fake news and vicious smears we so enjoy today, there was the National Enquirer . For most of our lives, the Enquirer stared up at us from the checkout aisle of our local supermarket. Somehow, we never made the connection that its readers would one day fit the stereotype of the Trump voter — under-educated, gullible, malleable, easy targets for disinformation. The Enquirer nurtured those targets over many decades, got them to believe virtually anything, and helped lay the groundwork for the sort of know-nothing insurgency that brought Trump into all our lives. Decades ahead of its time, the Enquirer was peddling fake news long before it was fashionable. It appealed unapologetically to humanity’s baser instincts, the ones most of us try to rise above. It was always flamboyantly sleazy, and always there in plain sight, something we could dependably