Skip to main content

Virginia Wakes Up and Smells the AstroTurf

Can we please stipulate that there is no idea quite so absurd as parents dictating the curriculum of public schools?

Sure, parents can — and should — participate in the process. They can organize. They can advocate for change. They can get themselves elected to the school board.

But when you consider all the whackos out there raising whacko children, the social contract surely demands that we leave public education in the hands of professional educators.

This obvious idea — fundamental to an education system that was once the envy of the world — is currently under assault from the right. And it took a direct hit last week in Virginia.

Republicans, as usual, invented a cause they could flog — “parental rights” — which they used as a dog whistle for the advancement of science denial and white supremacy. They managed to get a lot of voters riled up, first about vaccine mandates, then about the teaching of critical race theory. And they convinced too many gullible parents that they could change what their kids are taught, just by yelling about it. Flimsy as it all was, it was evidently enough to get out the vote.

Which is more than we can say for Democrats, 800,000 of whom didn’t bother to vote, and shame on them. Was it too much trouble to mail in a freaking ballot? This turnout problem — the so-called “enthusiasm gap” — has always been damaging, but at this point it’s become life-threatening. How do we get people to wake up and smell the danger?

The mainstream media is useless. They still have an unhealthy attachment to the old “Democrats in disarray” narrative, which was going full throttle before, during, and after the Virginia election. Especially troubling is the Washington Post’s role in pushing this narrative, given that they are, in effect, the local newspaper for much of Virginia.

The stories were, and still are, invariably about how Democrats never picked up on all those angry moms, and how they ceded that ground to those savvy Republicans. Some of that may have been true, but there were many other stories they could have told us as well, and to withhold them was dishonest to the point of complicity.

They could have told us how close the race actually was (they marveled at the narrow race in New Jersey, yet Virginia’s was even narrower). They could have mentioned the massive numbers of Democrats who didn’t show. And they could have been more forthcoming about how this supposedly “grassroots” uprising of mothers at school board meetings was just another Republican-designed “AstroTurf” campaign — an insidious, bought-and-paid-for parody of a real grassroots movement.

Remember the Tea Party? The Virginia campaign was from the same template — populism from the top down. Billionaires put up the money, right-wing media pumps out the messaging, party operatives run with it, and fools believe it.

In this case, small teams show up at school board meetings. They pretend they’re parents in the district. They get mothers worked up about race and vaccines. And they look the other way when school board members — dedicated volunteers working for the community — get threatened, vandalized, or trashed on social media.

In late September, I wrote about the Heritage Foundation — “The Engine Room of Right-Wing Propaganda” — whose fingerprints are all over this “movement.” I mentioned then that Heritage had latched onto critical race theory (CRT) — which at the time seemed an odd choice of axes to grind. CRT is, after all, an obscure academic pursuit that is taught exactly nowhere in the public school system.

It’s clear now that they thought it had a nice ring to it. “Race” was right in the middle of the phrase, flanked by “critical” and “theory,” both of which sound like the condescension of smartass college kids. When asked what CRT actually is, their voters have no clue — they just know it sounds like someone looking down on them.

Of course, Heritage has been targeting school boards for decades, grooming locals to serve on them in small cities and towns all over the country. These locals get indoctrinated in right-wing dogma through Heritage-sponsored programs.

When they can, they take over school budgets, spending too much on sports programs and too little on science, civics, and teacher pay. And when the school system starves for lack of funding, they can always blame those Democrats and their permissive socialist curriculum.

In Virginia, I’m sure the party hacks found no shortage of pet school boards to draw from, each board well stocked with ideologues eager to wax indignant about their childrens’ right to catch Covid while learning a vanilla version of American history.

So Heritage and its allies had their hook — parental rights — and they knew how to play it. They cranked out the racist tropes on their media machines. They got every talking head from Tucker Carlson on down to amplify the “threat” to our children. And they worked their infinitely malleable voters into a frenzy over a curriculum that doesn’t actually exist.

As to what the party will do with this cynical victory, that’s no mystery. They’ll bait and switch, as always.

The only promises they actually made in this campaign were to end CRT in classrooms — which will be easy because it never began — and to ban vaccine mandates. In other words, they made one irrelevant promise and one deadly one. That’s the bait.

The switch will be to their urgent need to subvert elections, and to push a copy-and-paste version of the Texas abortion law. All the Trumpiest big lies will take root in at least one house of the legislature. And as long as they’ve got mom’s attention, we can expect them to come after sex education, contraception, anything by Toni Morrison, and evolution.

To say that very few people voted for any of this — and that many who did vote for it stand to be hurt by it — means less than nothing to the GOP. But this is what happens when Democrats don’t show up.

Can Republicans do all these things? Maybe, maybe not. But every time they get one of these victories, they chip away at the democratic underpinnings of our society.

They play a long game, and they’ve been patiently undermining and remaking our education system for decades. They need the schools to produce the gullible voters of the future, and to train them to not pay attention.

So if we take nothing else from the Virginia election, let’s agree to remember this core truth about the Republican party, the Heritage Foundation, their billionaire donors, and their entire lavishly-endowed right-wing media empire:

They all have a vested interest in keeping their electorates angry and stupid. And they’re damn good at it.

 

Comments

  1. You're not wrong about right-wing voters: they're stupid. They listen to the lies that are spewed at them from their media outlets. Who else are they going to believe? The enemy? Doubtful. The lefties aren't much better. Granted, the left-wing agenda is certainly more egalitarian, but they've stooped to using the same tactics as the right and it's ugly. It is disingenuous to go on about how great the vaccines are without a single mention of their degrading efficacy in the face of new variants. And, when the right points this out, to call them conspiracy theorists and liars, is more cheap political tactics.

    You can argue that they're just playing the hand they've been dealt or that's what it takes to combat the bullshit coming from the right, but you don't get to claim the higher ground unless you're willing to stay on it, and the Democratic party is way off that hill. They may think they're helping themselves, but when both sides are lying and manipulating the public to get what they want, people just stop believing there's any truth out there to be found in the public sphere. THAT'S the most dangerous thing of all. I know it's like shooting fish in a barrel to call out the right for their part in this, but you'd have a bigger impact if you could get your own party to start behaving in a manner that would engender trust from those on the fringes of the right. Some reform in that regard might even build more enthusiasm for turning out to vote for the party's candidates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can't be serious. Where do you see the left "stoop to the same tactics as the right?" Are they trashing voting rights? Are they lying about the results of elections? Are they putting out bounties on women seeking abortions? Are they telling voters that climate change is a hoax? Are they obstructing vaccinations? Are they actively promoting a racist agenda? Are they threatening election officials and school board members? Are they encouraging science denial? Please cite one example of these "same tactics."

      And how would you propose to "engender trust from those on the fringes of the right?" Do you think they can even be spoken to, let alone influenced?

      This both-siderist nonsense — that a Democrat jaywalking is as bad as a Republican committing sedition — is both demonstrably false and deeply corrosive. Are you playing devil's advocate or do you actually believe it?

      Delete
  2. We are fucked. I hope it’s ok to use profanity on your blog. I agree with you Andy. I don’t see any way out of it. I knew a while back this was coming and I spent several hundred dollars of my own money organizing sending 1000 self addressed letters to Democratic voters in VA. I was heart broken. One bad comment can turn a campaign to trash. Basket of deplorable comes to mind. The country is so dumbed down it is excruciating.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elise Stefanik Wants to be Your President

It isn’t often that The New York Times and The Washington Post do lengthy features on the same politician in the same week. So when Elise Stefanik was given several thousand words in two major papers, my curiosity was duly piqued. The two pieces ( here and here ) are similar profiles of Stefanik, age 38, and her remarkable transformation from Harvard-educated “moderate” Republican, to ultra-MAGA ideologue. The subhead of the Times article states the theme of both: To rise through the Trump-era G.O.P., a young congresswoman gave up her friends, her mentors and her ideals. So how does a double feature like this happen, especially when there’s no immediate news driving it? Stefanik was not in the spotlight, though it was clear she would soon be taking a leading role in the new GOP House majority. So it could just be the coincidence of two reporters intuitively seizing on the same story. It happens. But it could also be that Stefanik herself, working with a clever publicist, set o

The Trump-Putin Bromance is Getting Another Look

The arrest last week of Charles McGonigal, former head of counterintelligence for the FBI, may or may not prove to be a watershed moment in our understanding of the Trump-Putin conspiracy. It’s still early, and the depths of the story have yet to be plumbed. So I’m not going to weigh in on that (you can read about it here ), except to note that people who’ve been watching the Trump-Russia show for over a decade are now going back to their notes and timelines, looking at old events in light of new information. And the more we all look, the more the miasma of Russian subterfuge stinks up every narrative. If a murderous oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, could actually recruit the FBI agent who’d investigated him — which the McGonigal affair will apparently show — who knows what else was going on? There is, I think, the need for some sort of “unified field theory” of the Trump-Putin relationship. There is much that we’re missing on at least three separate tracks of that bizarre bromance: Tru

Another Rousing Comeback for Antisemitism

I was in my late twenties in the late seventies, a single man sitting in a piano bar on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. It was St. Patrick’s Day, and I was in friendly conversation with an older Irish couple, there to celebrate their history. He wore a green tie, she a green blouse. Alcohol was involved. The conversation was free flowing, as random encounters with amiable strangers can be. When the talk turned to history, which can happen on St. Patrick’s Day, I put forth the notion — stolen, I think, from a Leon Uris novel I’d recently read — that the Irish and the Jews had much in common, that their shared history of oppression bonded them, that their experience of suffering and privation was deeply imbued in both their cultures. Not an especially profound insight, but the husband — to the surprise not just of me, but of his wife as well — was having none of it. In his sloshed but strident state, he insisted that the suffering of Jews couldn’t possibly be compared to what the I