Skip to main content

Virginia Wakes Up and Smells the AstroTurf

Can we please stipulate that there is no idea quite so absurd as parents dictating the curriculum of public schools?

Sure, parents can — and should — participate in the process. They can organize. They can advocate for change. They can get themselves elected to the school board.

But when you consider all the whackos out there raising whacko children, the social contract surely demands that we leave public education in the hands of professional educators.

This obvious idea — fundamental to an education system that was once the envy of the world — is currently under assault from the right. And it took a direct hit last week in Virginia.

Republicans, as usual, invented a cause they could flog — “parental rights” — which they used as a dog whistle for the advancement of science denial and white supremacy. They managed to get a lot of voters riled up, first about vaccine mandates, then about the teaching of critical race theory. And they convinced too many gullible parents that they could change what their kids are taught, just by yelling about it. Flimsy as it all was, it was evidently enough to get out the vote.

Which is more than we can say for Democrats, 800,000 of whom didn’t bother to vote, and shame on them. Was it too much trouble to mail in a freaking ballot? This turnout problem — the so-called “enthusiasm gap” — has always been damaging, but at this point it’s become life-threatening. How do we get people to wake up and smell the danger?

The mainstream media is useless. They still have an unhealthy attachment to the old “Democrats in disarray” narrative, which was going full throttle before, during, and after the Virginia election. Especially troubling is the Washington Post’s role in pushing this narrative, given that they are, in effect, the local newspaper for much of Virginia.

The stories were, and still are, invariably about how Democrats never picked up on all those angry moms, and how they ceded that ground to those savvy Republicans. Some of that may have been true, but there were many other stories they could have told us as well, and to withhold them was dishonest to the point of complicity.

They could have told us how close the race actually was (they marveled at the narrow race in New Jersey, yet Virginia’s was even narrower). They could have mentioned the massive numbers of Democrats who didn’t show. And they could have been more forthcoming about how this supposedly “grassroots” uprising of mothers at school board meetings was just another Republican-designed “AstroTurf” campaign — an insidious, bought-and-paid-for parody of a real grassroots movement.

Remember the Tea Party? The Virginia campaign was from the same template — populism from the top down. Billionaires put up the money, right-wing media pumps out the messaging, party operatives run with it, and fools believe it.

In this case, small teams show up at school board meetings. They pretend they’re parents in the district. They get mothers worked up about race and vaccines. And they look the other way when school board members — dedicated volunteers working for the community — get threatened, vandalized, or trashed on social media.

In late September, I wrote about the Heritage Foundation — “The Engine Room of Right-Wing Propaganda” — whose fingerprints are all over this “movement.” I mentioned then that Heritage had latched onto critical race theory (CRT) — which at the time seemed an odd choice of axes to grind. CRT is, after all, an obscure academic pursuit that is taught exactly nowhere in the public school system.

It’s clear now that they thought it had a nice ring to it. “Race” was right in the middle of the phrase, flanked by “critical” and “theory,” both of which sound like the condescension of smartass college kids. When asked what CRT actually is, their voters have no clue — they just know it sounds like someone looking down on them.

Of course, Heritage has been targeting school boards for decades, grooming locals to serve on them in small cities and towns all over the country. These locals get indoctrinated in right-wing dogma through Heritage-sponsored programs.

When they can, they take over school budgets, spending too much on sports programs and too little on science, civics, and teacher pay. And when the school system starves for lack of funding, they can always blame those Democrats and their permissive socialist curriculum.

In Virginia, I’m sure the party hacks found no shortage of pet school boards to draw from, each board well stocked with ideologues eager to wax indignant about their childrens’ right to catch Covid while learning a vanilla version of American history.

So Heritage and its allies had their hook — parental rights — and they knew how to play it. They cranked out the racist tropes on their media machines. They got every talking head from Tucker Carlson on down to amplify the “threat” to our children. And they worked their infinitely malleable voters into a frenzy over a curriculum that doesn’t actually exist.

As to what the party will do with this cynical victory, that’s no mystery. They’ll bait and switch, as always.

The only promises they actually made in this campaign were to end CRT in classrooms — which will be easy because it never began — and to ban vaccine mandates. In other words, they made one irrelevant promise and one deadly one. That’s the bait.

The switch will be to their urgent need to subvert elections, and to push a copy-and-paste version of the Texas abortion law. All the Trumpiest big lies will take root in at least one house of the legislature. And as long as they’ve got mom’s attention, we can expect them to come after sex education, contraception, anything by Toni Morrison, and evolution.

To say that very few people voted for any of this — and that many who did vote for it stand to be hurt by it — means less than nothing to the GOP. But this is what happens when Democrats don’t show up.

Can Republicans do all these things? Maybe, maybe not. But every time they get one of these victories, they chip away at the democratic underpinnings of our society.

They play a long game, and they’ve been patiently undermining and remaking our education system for decades. They need the schools to produce the gullible voters of the future, and to train them to not pay attention.

So if we take nothing else from the Virginia election, let’s agree to remember this core truth about the Republican party, the Heritage Foundation, their billionaire donors, and their entire lavishly-endowed right-wing media empire:

They all have a vested interest in keeping their electorates angry and stupid. And they’re damn good at it.

 

Comments

  1. You're not wrong about right-wing voters: they're stupid. They listen to the lies that are spewed at them from their media outlets. Who else are they going to believe? The enemy? Doubtful. The lefties aren't much better. Granted, the left-wing agenda is certainly more egalitarian, but they've stooped to using the same tactics as the right and it's ugly. It is disingenuous to go on about how great the vaccines are without a single mention of their degrading efficacy in the face of new variants. And, when the right points this out, to call them conspiracy theorists and liars, is more cheap political tactics.

    You can argue that they're just playing the hand they've been dealt or that's what it takes to combat the bullshit coming from the right, but you don't get to claim the higher ground unless you're willing to stay on it, and the Democratic party is way off that hill. They may think they're helping themselves, but when both sides are lying and manipulating the public to get what they want, people just stop believing there's any truth out there to be found in the public sphere. THAT'S the most dangerous thing of all. I know it's like shooting fish in a barrel to call out the right for their part in this, but you'd have a bigger impact if you could get your own party to start behaving in a manner that would engender trust from those on the fringes of the right. Some reform in that regard might even build more enthusiasm for turning out to vote for the party's candidates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can't be serious. Where do you see the left "stoop to the same tactics as the right?" Are they trashing voting rights? Are they lying about the results of elections? Are they putting out bounties on women seeking abortions? Are they telling voters that climate change is a hoax? Are they obstructing vaccinations? Are they actively promoting a racist agenda? Are they threatening election officials and school board members? Are they encouraging science denial? Please cite one example of these "same tactics."

      And how would you propose to "engender trust from those on the fringes of the right?" Do you think they can even be spoken to, let alone influenced?

      This both-siderist nonsense — that a Democrat jaywalking is as bad as a Republican committing sedition — is both demonstrably false and deeply corrosive. Are you playing devil's advocate or do you actually believe it?

      Delete
  2. We are fucked. I hope it’s ok to use profanity on your blog. I agree with you Andy. I don’t see any way out of it. I knew a while back this was coming and I spent several hundred dollars of my own money organizing sending 1000 self addressed letters to Democratic voters in VA. I was heart broken. One bad comment can turn a campaign to trash. Basket of deplorable comes to mind. The country is so dumbed down it is excruciating.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dobbs is Just the Bludgeon We’ve Been Looking For

I recently had occasion to engage in a brief political discussion with a bright and well-spoken woman in her mid-twenties. She was clearly perturbed at what she considered the failure of Democrats to push through the progressive agenda she and her generation have long been promised. I felt her pain, knowing how hard the next twenty or thirty years will be for her age group, not just in this country, but planetwide. She will surely be a witness to spontaneous atrocities, environmental calamities, and a competition for dwindling resources that will reduce many of her fellow humans to savagery. At the same time, I was embarrassed — as I often am — that I’m passing along to her a nation in far worse shape than it was when I found it. Even so, I felt she was being a bit hard on the Democrats in power, most of whom have, more or less, behaved admirably in pursuing basically the same agenda as hers, even as they remain shackled to a constitutional system on the very c

Putin’s Information Bubble Springs a Leak

The cat is out of the bag. The Russian citizenry can now be quite sure there’s a real war on, with real people dying. Something about a 300,000-man military draft — more likely a million — serves to focus the mind. It was only a matter of time before even the most brainwashed of parents would figure out that their sons were highly likely to be blown to pieces sometime soon. Who would have thought Putin’s hermetically-sealed information bubble would be pierced, not by liberals or intellectuals or human rights activists, but by the militant right? I suppose it does make a certain weird sense. The left has either fled the country, gone to jail, or — in most cases — opted to shut up and lay low for a decade or so. So it’s the far right that, curiously, is giving Putin the most heartburn. Specifically, it’s the ultra-militarist bloggers on Telegram — boasting millions of followers — who are reporting from the front lines of the war. And they’re telling it like it

They’re Using ‘Trump’ and ‘Espionage’ in the Same Sentence

It isn’t every day that a former president gets investigated for espionage. One more first for Donald Trump. Yes, we’ve all been titillated by every sordid new development in the ongoing saga of the Mar-a-Lago files. But the big question, at least for me, remains: What was he thinking? Why would he take state secrets out of the White House, knowing full well it’s a felony? Not that he’s a stranger to felonies, but still. The press has focused mainly on the make-believe theories thrown up by the wingnut right to explain away the obvious. But I’ve not seen much on the espionage angle itself. Which is strange. Because the very word ‘espionage’ puts an unmistakably sinister spin on Trump’s motives. It’s not a word that either CIA or DOJ throws around a lot. But it’s a word both are using. If there’s one thing we’ve learned about Trump it’s that life is about transactions, about trading favors. He is, by nature, a quid in search of the perfect pro quo. So while we don’t know how s