Skip to main content

Anger: The Operating System of Fascism

Anger has long played a key role in authoritarian regimes.

Since before Julius Caesar, slick propagandists with fascist agendas have routinely used the anger of the downtrodden to market lies and distract attention.

The Republican party, taking full advantage of the ignorance and poor education of its constituency, has learned well how to gull the gullible into ignoring their own interests and focusing instead on their anger.

Not that the anger isn’t real. It roils in the gut of people who sense they’ve been screwed, but who aren’t sure how, why, or by whom. They just feel messed with, and in the absence of coherent explanations they look for someone to be angry at.

Right-wing media is, of course, happy to provide. In that airtight, fact-free bubble, there’s never a shortage of “other” people to blame for everything wrong in their lives: Blacks, women, immigrants, the deep state, Muslims, Jews, queer folk of every stripe, and most of all, Democrats. The anger is always on simmer, and can always be turned up.

With this in mind, I refer you to the breakthrough research of economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton, which reveals the long and disturbing rise of what they’ve called “deaths of despair” among middle-aged white Americans.

In combing through demographic data, Case and Deaton discovered, hiding in plain sight, a silent epidemic of self-inflicted deaths. Startling numbers of older, less-educated people were dying early, mostly through drugs, alcohol-related diseases, suicide — or often enough, all three.

This epidemic has fallen hardest on people whose way of life has been undermined by economic and political forces beyond either their control or their understanding. They’ve seen their livelihoods disappear, followed by the slow erosions of their towns, their families, their sense of community, and their dignity. It leads them to depression, in both the economic and psychological sense. And yes, they’re angry about it.

Typically living in places where the industrial base has either been eliminated or moved overseas, these people, Case and Deaton argue, are the real-life victims of the ever-widening economic inequality that has plagued the nation for half a century. They live in poorer, very red states — Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, West Virginia — and would benefit immensely from government action to reduce that inequality. Instead, they’ve been systematically misled into compounding it.

Is it any wonder that appalling numbers of these victims have turned to self-destructive behavior? That they’d seek relief from the depression? That they’d look, at least subconsciously, for ways out?

Depression, it’s been said, is anger turned inward, anger directed at oneself. Perhaps the converse is also true, that anger is depression turned outward. Either way, anger and depression are intertwined and deeply corrosive. They surely play a significant role in those so-called deaths of despair. In manipulating anger so cynically, Republicans are in effect killing off their own voters.

We can think of anger as the operating system of fascism. It underlies and runs the elaborate software needed to seize and wield power. Bigotry, misogyny, xenophobia, homophobia, religious fanaticism, and the whole authoritarian playbook are all modules that run on that operating system. All are established programs, upgraded frequently, written in code that can accommodate new lies on a moment’s notice. And all are rooted in a seething anger that’s infinitely malleable.

One of the programs currently in vogue is the anti-vaccination hoax, and you can feel the anger building around it. Just like with face masks last year, anti-vax anger is being fed by the likes of Tucker Carlson in ways that are literally life-threatening.

This is a tricky one for Republicans. The Covid delta variant is out to tank the economy yet again, hitting their donor class of billionaires squarely in the wallet. The business world doesn't need this. It has enough to worry about — extreme heat, out-of-control wildfires, flash floods, and other obvious market hazards — without a totally avoidable Covid surge.

So in an effort to stuff Pandora back in the box, some Republicans — and some FOX shows — have been carefully walking back the anti-vax thing. It might be too late. The pent-up anger they’ve so cynically fueled is already costing the lives of Covid deniers. Not that they care about that. Only when it costs their donors serious money does it get their attention.

There are, of course, other programs running on the anger operating system. “Critical Race Theory” is the latest tweak to the ever-popular racism program, and it’s amazing how much anger it can create in people who have no idea what it is. Likewise, “Election Integrity” and “Stop the Steal” are little more than quick-and-dirty upgrades of the voter suppression routines Republicans have been running for decades.

One could make the case that anger is all they have going for them. From the top of the Republican party to the most imbecilic Trump voter, anger has taken the place not just of policy and political discourse, but also of reason, self-interest, and even self-preservation. Not to mention reality.

With so many angry people, so many of them already prone to the abuse of drugs, alcohol, and guns, more deaths of despair are inevitable. Especially when you add Covid denial into that mix.

That these people are being deliberately manipulated and misinformed raises the level of volatility, and the likelihood of violence and destruction. We’ve already seen it result in an obscene rash of mass shootings and at least one insurrection. Surely we can expect more of the same.

It’s enough to make a person angry.

 

Comments

  1. Sometimes I hate it that you're right. On the other hand, it is so well said.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Characterizing all Republicans who are not wealthy as idiots, is like characterizing all Democrats as commie pinkos. There are lots of different reasons why people choose their political party and it seems unkind to sweep their reasons away in a sentence.

    Our political system gives people few choices. When we are passionate about one thing that is important to us, that thing may necessitate a choice despite having conflicting beliefs with other aspects of the party's position.

    As with most things, it's complicated. To simplify it in this manner is a disservice to the kind of sane dialog we so desperately need.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah, at this point they're either idiots or morally compromised. You can't be in that party any more, see what it's doing, and not be appalled. That dialog isn't going to happen -- they'll make sure of it.

      Delete
    2. Interesting, I had the same response as my brother when I read that line. What I felt was that I agreed with you (because I too am angry) but I knew I couldn't share the post this time for that same reason. I know I'm also in a bubble and can't see the whole picture for other people.

      Delete
    3. Andy, I suppose we would need to come to some agreement about the meaning of "idiot." If you mean having listened to your family and friends tell you things your whole life that have come to be "truth" with no need for further research and supported by a party that inoculates its members by discouraging use of opposing sources of information, then, yes, they are idiots. But by then we may all be idiots of a sort.

      Delete
    4. Yes it's a squishy concept, but let's use as a working definition "person who is either incapable or unwilling to engage in critical thinking" and accepts as gospel anything said on Fox, Breitbart, or other rightwing lie machines. That should do it.

      Delete
    5. I'm okay with this definition of "idiot" if it also includes: "person who is either incapable or unwilling to engage in critical thinking and accepts as gospel anything said on MSNBC, Huffington Post, or other leftwing lie machines." If you believe that those sources just happen to get everything right and the rightwing sources get everything wrong, then you haven't done enough research...which wouldn't constitute critical thinking IMHO.

      Delete
    6. I do object to calling those lie machines. Slanted, yes. But largely fact-based. Fox et al are fact-free, reality-free, and following a malicious and lavishly financed agenda. I have my beefs with MSNBC et al, but they aren't trying to take down the whole system. They aren't telling me that up is down, 2+2=W, and the election was stolen. There is absolutely no comparison.

      Delete
    7. I will grant you that Fox is far looser with reality. But, who doesn't have an agenda? One could try to make the argument that the Dems are attempting to make things better for everyone, but "better" is not an absolute construct. There is real news on Fox. Sadly, they also have Tucker Carlson, who should be as far away from the word news as possible.

      Delete
    8. You're speaking in abstractions, which is theoretically fine, but the "real" news on Fox is not the real — and existential — danger we now face. Fox is malignant and its viewers are brainwashed. Again, not even a slight comparison.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Guess Where You Can Find the Real Pedophiles

When political discourse turns to pedophilia — which it should never, ever do — it helps to separate fiction from non-fiction. The fictional narrative, widely disseminated by QAnon-addled propagandists, is that the Democratic Party is a vast conspiracy of ravenous child abusers, who just barely managed to cover up Hillary Clinton’s bloodthirsty coven in the basement of a D.C. pizza parlor. The non-fiction narrative — profusely-documented but with a much lower profile — is that both the priesthood of the Catholic Church and the ministries of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) have indulged and protected a stunningly large number of child molesters, and allowed them to enjoy long and predatory careers within their respective churches. In the last few weeks, these two stories flew somewhat under the radar, but both are worth looking at, not so much for the staggering hypocrisy of its characters — hypocrisy fatigue has long since rendered us numb — as for its legal and political i

Sex: The Abortion Origin Story

In the next month, five ultra-Catholic ideologues, unencumbered by any rational thought process, will decide that a fetus has more rights than its mother. When that happens, the legislatures in as many as 26 states will likely enact laws, under which a pregnant woman will, in effect, be legally obligated to carry to term every fetus that takes root in her body. Whether or not she was raped by a stranger, or by her father. Whether or not she miscarries. Whether or not the baby dies in her womb. Whether or not the baby is capable of life outside her womb. Whether or not that baby’s survival is likely to kill her. The rights of her fetus will, apparently in all cases, supercede hers. And her partner’s, too. Because for every beer-soaked asshole who will now be empowered to force his battered wife to carry his baby, there will be hundreds of responsible husbands legally barred from responsibly planning a family, or from ending a family-crippling pregnancy, or from choosing the life

The New York Times Is Doing Us No Favors

I am a life-long customer of The New York Times, and generally a satisfied one. For sheer news-gathering firepower, they continue to stand out in a tarnished but still important field. They’ve covered — or uncovered — virtually every major story of the last century and a half. Their investigative prowess is unquestioned. Plus, they have Paul Krugman on their op-ed page, an invaluable source of level-headed insights on a wide range of subjects. He combines a Nobel-level knowledge of economics with an astute political eye that is almost always dead on. He alone is worth the paywall, at least to me. But with all that said, the Times has lately been pissing me off. They’ve become unreasonably invested in what Krugman himself has decried as “false equivalency” — better known as “both-siderism.” They continue to pretend that our two major parties are equally engaged in reasonable discourse, and are equally responsible for the fractious and violent state of the nation. The Times scrup