Skip to main content

Rudy’s Ukraine Antics Come Back to Embarrass Us

So how stupid was that whole Ukraine thing?

Stupid enough to extort the new president of Ukraine into digging up dirt on Trump’s perceived enemies.

Stupid enough to get a career diplomat fired because she wasn’t corrupt enough for the Trump administration.

Stupid enough to get Trump himself impeached.

Stupid enough to land Rudy Giuliani — “America’s Mayor” — in so much hot water he could easily die in prison.

And for what?

The announcement of an investigation. Not even an actual investigation, mind you, just the announcement of one. Just announce to the world that Hunter Biden broke the law. Which law? Of which country? Doesn’t matter.

Hey Ukraine, just do us this one little favor, tell the press this one little lie, and we’ll make your problems go away. We’ll free up that weaponry you so desperately need from the bureaucratic crack it somehow fell through, so you can defend your eastern border from Trump’s pal Putin.

What was in Rudy’s mind? Did he think this would be the big breakthrough, the thing that would turn the American public against Joe Biden forever? The thing that would make us all change our minds about Donald Trump? The thing that would send us all to the polls so we could gleefully re-elect him?

That’s not just stupid. That’s embarrassing.

But embarrassment aside, we don’t want this sordid chapter in American history to disappear down the memory hole, like so many other Trump atrocities seem to do. So let’s review:

Volodymyr Zelensky — a TV comedian who made his name satirizing Ukraine’s systemic, oligarch-fueled corruption — gets elected president on an anti-corruption platform. He takes office just as the eastern region of his country comes under military threat from secessionist rebels, many of whom are Russian troops in unmarked uniforms. And this was a mere five years after Putin stole the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine. At gunpoint.

All Zelensky needed was the tiniest show of support from the US. This was hardly too much to ask — Ukraine had been a NATO-sponsored buffer against Russian aggression since the end of the Cold War. All he needed was the money and weaponry that had long been promised, and had always been delivered in the past. He could also have used a simple five-minute photo op with the American president — even if it had to be Trump — just to keep Putin on his toes, somewhat.

Instead, all he got was Trump’s famous “perfect” phone call, the one that made “quid pro quo” the catchphrase of the year. You give us dirt on the Bidens, we’ll give you weapons. Sorry, no photo op.

So Zelensky, having no other choice, pandered. He flattered Trump. He promised to announce Trump’s bogus investigation. He debased himself for the sake of his country. And he dodged a bullet. Luckily, he never had to actually deliver the investigation into the Bidens, mostly due to the timely intervention of an American whistleblower.

Meanwhile, Marie Yovanovitch — the American ambassador who led the charge against the corruption Zelensky was elected to deal with — was rudely removed from her post by Mike Pompeo’s State Department. This little coup, engineered by Rudy, is the specific — if hardly the only — reason Rudy now has the feds deconstructing his life.

But how much damage did this pathetic episode wreak? What do our allies think of this, especially after Trump tried his best to undermine old alliances in his eagerness to suck up to Putin? How much trust got destroyed? How do we get that trust back?

It’s easy to say that things are now back to normal, that Tony Blinken has restored professionalism to the diplomatic corps, that the grownups are back in charge. But what does that look like from our allies’ point of view?

Because Ukraine didn’t happen in a vacuum. By then, our entire foreign policy was already a hot mess, sabotaged from within. By then, copy-and-paste political hacks had infested the State Department. By then, professional diplomats up and down the org chart had been forced out of their jobs.

The people running Europe’s democracies are neither stupid nor blind. Where once they saw power and leadership, they now see an America that is at best dysfunctional, and at worst malevolent. They see a country virtually incapable of moving in any direction, forward or back. They’re embarrassed by us, and for us.

They watch in horror as one of our two political parties goes rogue, determined to do nothing in the face of major crises, offering nothing but craven lies and lunatic conspiracy theories.

Is that supposed to instill confidence? Can we assure them the lunatics won’t be back in charge of Congress in 2022? Can we know for sure they won’t be dealing with President Gaetz in 2024?

Keep in mind that they’ve seen this movie before, though in far tamer form. They’ll remember the run-up to the Iraq War, when George W. Bush was hell-bent on taking down Saddam Hussein — and when, in the absence of an actual reason, he made one up. They’ll remember all too well those “weapons of mass destruction” that turned out not to exist.

It took eight years of Obama-era professionalism to walk back that damage. Only to see the assholes back in charge, just eight years later. And light years crazier.

Think what Trump put our most important allies through. Never knowing if their intelligence secrets were compromised. Never knowing if Trump would withhold funding for crucial defenses. Never knowing if he’d pull troops out of Europe just for fun. Never knowing if a presidential tantrum would launch a nuclear war. Would you trust a country like that?

And it’s not just a matter of trust. It’s about competence as well. The diplomats we sent them were amateurs and boors, chosen for their loyalty and their campaign donations. Exactly what our allies can expect next time Republicans are put in charge.

Why would any rationally run country put up with these cyclical catastrophes? Who wants to deal with known liars? Who says there won’t be more Trumps and more Giulianis, in a vicious circle of corruption and incompetence?

These countries get all the gaslighting and disinformation they need from Russia and China. Why would they need it from us?

Comments

  1. Oh so totally painful and so totally true. Gotta keep those Votefwd.org letters coming!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Obama- era professionalism my ads, like destroying democracy in Honduras, turning Syria into a hell-hole by ways of destroying Lybia and raiding it's armories(see operation Sycamore Timber look it up), and creating the biggest refugee crisis in Europe, Regardless of which party is in power, America's foreign policy sucks, please stop kidding yourself...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

France and Britain Just Gave the Finger to Fascism

There is now ample evidence that people with democratic systems of government actually like them, and would just as soon keep them, flaws and all. There seems to be a strong backlash occurring in several European countries, a trend toward shoring up democracies threatened by toxic authoritarian forces. In Poland last year, then in France and Britain last week, actual voters — as opposed to deeply compromised opinion polls — gave a big middle finger to the fascists in their midst. I don’t pretend to understand the electoral systems of these countries — let alone their political currents — but I’m struck by the apparent connections between different elections in different countries, and what they might be saying to us. I’ve spoken before of Poland , where ten years of vicious minority rule was overturned at the ballot box. A ban on abortion was the galvanizing issue — sound familiar? — and it brought an overwhelming number of voters to the polls, many for the fir

Don’t Let the New York Times Do Your Thinking

  My father would not live any place where the New York Times couldn’t be delivered before 7:00 a.m. To him, the Times was “the newspaper of record,” the keeper of the first drafts of history. It had the reach and the resources to be anywhere history was being made, and the skills to report it accurately. He trusted it more than any other news source, including Walter Cronkite. Like my dad, I grew to associate the Times with serious journalism, the first place one goes for the straight story. Their news was always assumed to be objectively presented, with the facts front-and-center. Their op-ed writers were well-reasoned and erudite, even when I thought they were full of shit. But there was more. The Times became — for me, at least — a sort of guide to critical thinking. It helped teach me, at an impressionable age, to weigh the facts before forming an opinion. And many of my opinions — including deeply-held ones — were formed around facts I might have read

Democrats, Step Away from the Ledge

  Anxiety comes easily to Democrats. We’re highly practiced at perceiving a crisis, wanting to fix it immediately, and being consistently frustrated when we can’t. Democrats understand consequences, which is why we always have plenty to worry about. Republicans don’t give a rat’s ass about consequences — which is, let’s face it, their superpower. I wasn’t intending to write about last Thursday’s debate, mostly because I post on Tuesdays, and this could be old news by the time it gets to you. But then the New York Times weighed in with a wildly disingenuous editorial calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race, and the rest of the mainstream media piled on. In the Times' not-so-humble opinion, Biden needs to consider “the good of the country,” something their own paper has repeatedly failed to do for almost a decade. And since this is now the crisis du jour for virtually every Democrat who watched that shitshow, I thought I might at l