Skip to main content

Branding the Party of Stupid

Let’s talk about the Republican brand. An unpleasant subject, I know, but well worth watching as it turns rancid.

Marketing has always been a strength of the GOP. They don’t do policy at all, and they’ve stopped even paying lip-service to reality. But they’ve always had a singular knack for mass manipulation.

From Lee Atwater to Karl Rove to Roger Ailes, the party has long been a showcase for brilliant but bent marketing talent, people who understood their target audience and knew what messages would resonate.

Those messages have always been deeply fraudulent, and for good reason. They know they can’t tell their audience the real story. The one about who they are and what they stand for.

Because the real story is tax cuts and deregulation, nothing else. That’s what they want their brand to be about, but it’s a lousy product. Nobody with a net worth of less than $10 million has any interest in it. So rather than promote it, they’ve had to put up smokescreens to divert attention away from it. Those smokescreens have grown — especially in recent years — increasingly haphazard, nonsensical, and unworkable.

Which is a marketing nightmare, because the target audience for the brand is now split into two very different — and mutually exclusive — demographics.

The first is, metaphorically speaking, the WASP-y, suburban country club crowd — that rapidly vanishing breed we associate with the traditional GOP. They still ostensibly control the party, along with its elected officials and most of its money. But their rank-and-file voters, fed up with the party’s ever-steeper descent into depravity, are abandoning them in droves — mostly out of embarrassment. They’re finally seeing what’s in front of their eyes, bless their hearts. If only there were more of them.

The second group is much larger, and much more gullible. It’s that strange coalition of evangelicals, white supremacists, and gun nuts — the fabled Trump base — who do the actual voting that keeps the party in office. Among the things they have in common — besides racism, xenophobia, homophobia, and misogyny — is their total indifference to tax cuts (which don’t really affect them) and deregulation (which they can’t spell).

For decades, the first group kept the second one voting their way, mostly through a devil’s bargain: In exchange for those remarkably uninformed votes, the party made sure to keep the culture wars well stoked. Through a variety of fears, outright lies and any scapegoat that was handy — immigrants, Black people, gay people, feminists, and so on — they were able to successfully harness a lot of seething resentment and corrosive anger, and use it for nefarious purposes. Witness the Capitol insurrection.

As marketers, we’re taught that a brand and its attendant messaging should be aligned with the overall brand strategy. The trouble for the GOP is that the brand strategy keeps slipping inexorably into craziness, taking the messaging with it.

What is that strategy, anyway? When Joe Scarborough — talk show host and ex-Republican congressman — famously called his former cronies “the party of stupid,” he was actually on to something.

Because the GOP’s strategy — unwritten, as far as we know, but no less toxic — is to leverage the stupidity of their base, to turn that stupidity into anger, and to turn that anger into votes. It’s not clear that this is sustainable.

The underlying assumption is that the target audience is irredeemably ignorant. That they’ll believe anything. That they can be infinitely manipulated. That they can be reprogrammed to change their beliefs on a moment’s notice. That they can be taught to ignore their own interests and subscribe — literally, as well as figuratively — to outright lies.

The messages that flow from these assumptions are mostly a deranged mash-up of fantasy and received anger. I’m sure you all have your own favorites, but here’s my partial list:

-      Democrats are evil. They are the party of pedophiles and, even worse, socialists. The checks they send you can't be real money. Their vaccines will kill you and make you sterile, in that order.

-      Being white is an entitlement. White people are free to do whatever they want, to whomever they want. Non-white people are not.

-      Voting is reserved for white people exclusively. No voting bill is too racist, cruel, or absurd to sign into law, preferably in front of plantation paintings.

-      Guns are fine, in any quantity, of any caliber. The second amendment extends to all must-have home defense weaponry, up to and including surface-to-air missiles.

-      Donald Trump is the only politician who has ever told the truth about anything.

-      “War is peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is strength.”

With messaging like this, it’s no surprise that their audience is dwindling, or that cheating is their only path to continued power.

So the question becomes whether the target audience really is as stupid as the party thinks it is. Or, more to the point, will that audience learn to better identify and buy into its own interests?

Specifically, will their dread of the deep state extend to not cashing checks that arrive in their mailbox? Will they be able to withstand vaccination when their families won’t let them near their grandchildren without one? Will they refuse to accept a smaller monthly premium for their health insurance? Will they continue to ignore weather catastrophes as they become distressingly frequent? Will they ever see that their party, with its wealth-centric agenda, has made their lives, their livelihoods, and their lifestyles immeasurably worse?

The likely answers to these questions are not promising, and I hesitate to give this audience the benefit of any doubt. From all evidence, they are easily as dense as the GOP thinks they are.

So the party will have no choice but to keep pandering to them. They have to keep the devil’s bargain going, while suppressing as many non-white votes as they can.

As marketing strategies go, this is iffy. It’s possible that they’ve backed themselves into a corner, and that their tactics are so transparently cynical that they’ll keep hemorrhaging voters well into the future.

But that said, they remain lavishly funded and openly villainous. Which means we’d be insane to underestimate either their corrupt intentions or their voters’ malleability.

 

Comments

  1. Their latest shiny object distraction? The phony meat hoax. You can’t make this s**t up. ... Oh right. I forgot it’s their brand.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They may have a dwindling audience but thanks to Trump's screwing with the Census and Governors like DeSantis and Kemp screwing with voting rights and a currently stacked Supreme Court, I'm not sure we'll ever see another Dem in the Whitehouse in our lifetime or even your children's lifetime.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Our best hope is to fire up the folks who are being disenfranchised by these crazies and get them voting in spite of what’s happening to voting rights. Groups like Swing Left, votefwd.org, Indivisible and Fair Fight, should get our dollars and support NOW! They orchestrated sending out 17 million letters to these disenfranchised voters in 2020 and it may have been the reason we have a Democrat in the White House!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dobbs is Just the Bludgeon We’ve Been Looking For

I recently had occasion to engage in a brief political discussion with a bright and well-spoken woman in her mid-twenties. She was clearly perturbed at what she considered the failure of Democrats to push through the progressive agenda she and her generation have long been promised. I felt her pain, knowing how hard the next twenty or thirty years will be for her age group, not just in this country, but planetwide. She will surely be a witness to spontaneous atrocities, environmental calamities, and a competition for dwindling resources that will reduce many of her fellow humans to savagery. At the same time, I was embarrassed — as I often am — that I’m passing along to her a nation in far worse shape than it was when I found it. Even so, I felt she was being a bit hard on the Democrats in power, most of whom have, more or less, behaved admirably in pursuing basically the same agenda as hers, even as they remain shackled to a constitutional system on the very c

Putin’s Information Bubble Springs a Leak

The cat is out of the bag. The Russian citizenry can now be quite sure there’s a real war on, with real people dying. Something about a 300,000-man military draft — more likely a million — serves to focus the mind. It was only a matter of time before even the most brainwashed of parents would figure out that their sons were highly likely to be blown to pieces sometime soon. Who would have thought Putin’s hermetically-sealed information bubble would be pierced, not by liberals or intellectuals or human rights activists, but by the militant right? I suppose it does make a certain weird sense. The left has either fled the country, gone to jail, or — in most cases — opted to shut up and lay low for a decade or so. So it’s the far right that, curiously, is giving Putin the most heartburn. Specifically, it’s the ultra-militarist bloggers on Telegram — boasting millions of followers — who are reporting from the front lines of the war. And they’re telling it like it

They’re Using ‘Trump’ and ‘Espionage’ in the Same Sentence

It isn’t every day that a former president gets investigated for espionage. One more first for Donald Trump. Yes, we’ve all been titillated by every sordid new development in the ongoing saga of the Mar-a-Lago files. But the big question, at least for me, remains: What was he thinking? Why would he take state secrets out of the White House, knowing full well it’s a felony? Not that he’s a stranger to felonies, but still. The press has focused mainly on the make-believe theories thrown up by the wingnut right to explain away the obvious. But I’ve not seen much on the espionage angle itself. Which is strange. Because the very word ‘espionage’ puts an unmistakably sinister spin on Trump’s motives. It’s not a word that either CIA or DOJ throws around a lot. But it’s a word both are using. If there’s one thing we’ve learned about Trump it’s that life is about transactions, about trading favors. He is, by nature, a quid in search of the perfect pro quo. So while we don’t know how s