Skip to main content

One Last Grift for the Road

The words “Trump” and “master plan” have no business in the same sentence. There is no master plan. There’s probably no plan at all. This is Trump we’re talking about.

Yes, he’s throwing up an amazing amount of smoke. But as always with Trump, there’s no reason to believe a word of it.

Mostly I think he’s in a panic. He has to assume there’s a world of hurt coming for him the minute he leaves the White House.

And he will leave. I don’t buy any of the grandiose and megalomaniacal ambitions people attribute to him. He won’t be bodily removed. He won’t start his own cable channel. He won’t be running for president in 2024. He won’t be a Republican kingmaker.

Yes, I could be wrong, so let’s not call this prediction — more like speculation. But I think he’s too old, too lazy, and too politically inept to sustain any of this beyond January 20.

More to the point, he’ll have his hands full fending off criminal and civil charges that could well consume the rest of his life.

So he needs money. Lots and lots of money. He has multiple prosecutions waiting for him, both criminal and civil, which will require the attention of extremely high-priced lawyers. Most won’t want to work for him on any terms. None will work for him without getting their fees up front. His reputation for stiffing law firms is legendary.

And that’s just about the New York cases. If the feds come after him — and there’s no shortage of federal crimes — that would triple or quadruple his legal bills. He’ll probably try to pardon himself, which will need to work itself out, but for now New York will be the path of least resistance. I don’t doubt people are coming for him. Neither does he.

On top of that, he has at least $400 million in loans coming due. Deutsche Bank, his principal enabler and laundry service, isn’t letting him off the hook this time. Vornado just backed out of a major deal with him. He’s trying to sell Trump International Hotel in Washington, but nobody seems interested — once he’s out of office, that stay-to-play scam won’t work anymore.

A word about commercial real estate at this level — especially in New York. The guys on the other end of these supposed deals are the real sharks of the real estate world — the guys Trump wishes he could be. And there is no doubt they will smell his blood in the water.

Because anything with the Trump name on it — whether it’s an office tower, hotel, golf course, or resort — will see its market value plummet the minute he leaves office. All these properties have already taken a hit from the metastasizing toxicity of the Trump brand.

So he’ll be desperate to raise cash, which means he’ll be desperate to sell. Which means the sharks will circle. These guys know Trump for the lightweight loser he’s always been, going back four decades. They’ll know those properties will be radioactive for years, and they’ll lowball him to death. He’ll be lucky to get fifty cents on the dollar. If he can sell at all.

With these twin catastrophes, legal and financial, looming in just two months, it should come as no surprise that he’s doing what he always does. He’s working a con. Or several cons.

The most obvious one is his lame but dangerous refusal to concede the election. This is all about his leadership PAC, which brings in money from his idiot base. He bombs them with texts and emails multiple times a day. He gets them all riled up about the election being stolen. He convinces them that Democrats will soon drop from the sky and eat their children. He scares them into donating to his “Election Defense Fund.”

Of course, it’s all a bait-and-switch. There is no defense fund, and the money just goes to Trump-controlled political committees.

Somehow, that PAC money will make its way into his pocket, whether it’s directly in cash, or by hosting PAC activities at those fabulous Trump properties, which is indistinguishable from money laundering.

So the longer he can string along the rubes, the more money he can grift. If he concedes, that all goes away.

But it’s the monkeying around in foreign affairs that’s harder to figure. And scarier. He’s been musing about bombing Iran. He talks about pulling all troops out of Afghanistan. He’s purged the top levels of the defense department and intelligence community. He’s frantically replacing people who are merely reprehensible with people truly vile. WTF?

There’s certainly an element of psychotic petulance to this — the perverse need to leave as big a mess as he can for the Biden administration to clean up. But that’s not transactional enough for Trump. He needs to get something out of it. He needs a quo for every quid.

The fear is that he’ll send Jared over to Bibi and offer to bomb Iran to dust for a $500 million deposit in the Caymans. Or that he’ll sell Putin our agents in the Kremlin, guaranteeing their death. Or that he’s getting a hefty finder’s fee under the table from that arms sale to UAE.

With friends like Putin, MBS, Erdogan, and Bolsonaro, the opportunities to trade a few hundred thousand lives for some ready cash may prove irresistible.

The next two months might well be Trump’s last gasp of relevance, so you know he wants to make the most of it while he can. The question is how much of an asshole does he want to be? How much damage can be done from pure petulance? What deals will he make? What secrets will he sell? What crimes are already in progress? And to what extent will Republican senators and executive branch flunkies continue to abet him?

There is still plenty of room for pessimism.

 

Comments

  1. When it comes to being an asshole Trump has only one rival, Mitch McConnell. Together the corner the market ion evil. The torturers of the Inquisition are apprentices compared to these two. I hope your prediction of Trump tumbling into total lack of relevance is on point. I consider him to be dog shit on the shoe of the USA that must be scraped off.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Both Trump and McConnell have no real ideology, so it's a stretch to call them "evil."
    They are supremely selfish, and unscrupulous in grabbing money/attention/power [Trump] or power [McConnell].

    The policies they promote are, from my perspective, "evil" but are these two?

    If Trump could have ridden a platform of "medicare for all" and "revoking the Hyde Amendment" to the White House, he would have exploited the presidency to enhance his coffers and ego, and he would have glommed onto those policy positions without further thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Trump is demented, not evil, though in his case it's a fine line. McConnell is indeed supremely selfish, which can be indistinguishable from evil, as you point out. But there is evil out there. Stephen Miller seems to qualify under any definition, but I'm sure he's really nice once you get to know him. And a few others.

      Delete
    2. To your other point, Trump, being a New Yorker, was a Democrat most of his life. He's only a Republican now because that's where the rubes are.

      Delete
    3. "He's only a Republican now because that's where the rubes are."

      And the rubles.

      Delete
  3. Let's not forget, Pompeo just had a secret meeting in Saudi Arabia with MBS & Netanyahu. Pompeo was supposed to be on his way home, but the foreign press is unlike our press. They aren't stenographers. Someone tipped them off about some phony flight plans and the rest now history. Netanyahu had just put on that show about congratulating handsome Joe and how that silly Pompeo was only there to talk about his future political ambitions which is strange since Pompeo had just made such a big deal about Trump's second term. Netanyahu made a huge point of telling Pompeo goodbye just to sneak off in the middle of the night in order to go to another country to meet him secretly. GMAFB. Not unless they were planning something important. Oddly enough after the meeting trump comes out and is suddenly OK with the transition. The only times we know trump has killed someone on the qt he used Israeli operatives or MBS operatives. I'm nervous about all of it. Especially for Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am not only nervous I am High Sterical !!!!

    LOVE ? Who





    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blackmail for Fun and Profit

Once in a while, I like to use this space to indulge in some idle speculation, taking a few what-ifs and seeing where they lead. I tend to do this in response to some stimulus, some ping to my brain. Which is just what Keith Olbermann provided in one of his podcasts last week. He was talking about Jeff Bezos’ upcoming wedding to Lauren Sanchez, the woman with whom Bezos had been having the affair that ultimately ended his marriage. You'll recall that in 2019, Trump operators had a heavy hand in that breakup, having attempted to blackmail Bezos into coercing The Washington Post, which he owns, into covering Trump more obsequiously. It's rare to see such an instance of high-level blackmail surface in public, and we only know about it because Bezos didn't bite. He outed himself, he went public about the whole affair, thereby ending his marriage, which was apparently on the ropes anyway. An unusually happy postscript to this otherwise routine multi-bill

The Mainstream Media Continues to Disappoint

The awkward term "both-siderism" has, at long last, stepped into the limelight, thanks to the graceful gravitas of CNN icon Christiane Amanpour (full disclosure: our dog used to play with her dog). In one brilliant commencement address , to the Columbia School of Journalism, she dope-slapped her own profession and, indeed, her own boss, both of whom richly deserved it. That takes guts, not to mention a reputation for integrity. Both of which she has in abundance. What she said about the "both sides" problem in journalism is nothing new. But to those of us who've been screaming about it for years, it's refreshing to hear it denounced by a mainstream journalist of her stature, in a venue that serves as an incubator of mainstream journalism. While she declined to mention names, there was no doubt about the targets of her irritation. CNN and its chairman, Chris Licht, were still licking their wounds from their treacherous but buffoonish

The Definition of Defamation is Up in the Air

Underlying all the recent commotion surrounding Fox, Tucker Carlson, and the mess they've created for themselves, there's an important legal issue that has flown largely under the radar, but may soon be ready for its closeup. It's a First Amendment issue concerning the meaning of defamation, and the standard that must be met to prove it. The constitutionality of the existing standard was expected to be tested in the Fox-Dominion case, had that case come to trial. But since that didn't happen, I figured it would go back to the back burner. But then, last week, Ron DeSantis had it blow up in his face , giving the whole issue new momentum, and from a surprising direction. His own people took him down. DeSantis had talked his pet legislature into launching an outrageous assault on freedom of the press, eviscerating existing libel laws, and making it easier for public figures — like, say, DeSantis himself— to sue for defamation. One can just imagine DeSantis cackling